The Cantor Set: Measure Zero yet Uncountable
Problem
Construct the Cantor set by starting with and repeatedly removing the open middle third:
Prove both of the following:
- has Lebesgue measure zero.
- is uncountable.
Why It's Interesting
These two facts together are shocking: is "negligibly small" from the measure-theoretic viewpoint (you can cover it with intervals of total length for any ), yet it is "as large as " from the cardinality viewpoint. It demolished the naive intuition that "measure zero countable." It is also closed, nowhere dense, perfect, and totally disconnected โ a remarkable object.
Answer: view
Answer: The Cantor Set โ Measure Zero yet Uncountable
Part 1: Measure Zero
At each stage , we remove open intervals each of length .
Total measure removed:
So all of is removed, and:
Part 2: Uncountable
Key idea: every point in has a base-3 (ternary) expansion using only the digits .
Why: At each stage, removing the middle third eliminates exactly those numbers whose ternary expansion has a in the -th position (that is genuinely a , not a tail of 's). What remains are numbers expressible as:
Now define the map by replacing each digit with and reading in base 2:
This map is surjective onto : every binary sequence lifts to a sequence , giving a point in .
Since is uncountable and , we conclude:
The Punchline
The Cantor set has the same cardinality as , yet measure zero. The bijection works because has a product structure: each point is an independent binary choice at each stage, giving , which has cardinality .
This is why "small in measure" and "small in cardinality" are completely orthogonal notions.