🧮 Brain Teaser

Injective Entire Functions Are Linear

Let f:C→Cf:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C} be an entire function that is injective.

Prove that ff must be affine:

f(z)=az+bfor some a,b∈C, a≠0.f(z) = az + b \qquad \text{for some } a,b\in\mathbb{C},\ a\neq 0.

Corollary to keep in mind: the biholomorphic automorphisms of C\mathbb{C} are exactly the maps z↦az+bz\mapsto az+b.

Hint (if you want one): study the behavior of ff near ∞\infty, that is, the singularity of g(w)=f(1/w)g(w)=f(1/w) at w=0w=0. Which of the three singularity types are compatible with injectivity?

singularity at infinityCasorati-Weierstrassopen mapping theoremautomorphisms of Centire functions

Answer: Injective Entire Functions Are Linear

Key Idea / Intuition

Every entire function has a singularity at ∞\infty of exactly one type: removable, pole, or essential. A removable singularity makes ff bounded, hence constant. An essential singularity makes ff wildly non-injective: near ∞\infty, ff comes arbitrarily close to every value. In particular it lands in the open set f(unit disk)f(\text{unit disk}), which is already "used up." So ∞\infty must be a pole, which forces ff to be a polynomial. A polynomial of degree nn is generically nn-to-11, so injectivity forces n=1n=1.


Formal Proof / Solution

Since ff is injective, it is nonconstant. Define

g(w)=f(1/w),w≠0.g(w) = f(1/w), \qquad w\neq 0.

Then gg is holomorphic on C∖{0}\mathbb{C}\setminus\{0\}, and w=0w=0 is an isolated singularity of gg. We examine the three possible cases.

Case 1: removable singularity. Then gg is bounded near 00, so ff is bounded on {∣z∣>R}\{|z|>R\} for some RR. It is also bounded on the compact set {∣z∣≤R}\{|z|\le R\}. Hence ff is a bounded entire function, so it is constant by Liouville's theorem. This contradicts injectivity.

Case 2: essential singularity. Let D={∣z∣<1}D=\{|z|<1\}.

  • By the open mapping theorem, U:=f(D)U := f(D) is a nonempty open set.
  • By Casorati–Weierstrass, the image of the punctured disk under gg is dense in C\mathbb{C}:
g({0<∣w∣<1})=f({∣z∣>1}).g(\{0<|w|<1\}) = f(\{|z|>1\}).
  • A dense set meets every nonempty open set, so it meets UU.

Therefore there exist z1z_1 with ∣z1∣<1|z_1|<1 and z2z_2 with ∣z2∣>1|z_2|>1 such that f(z1)=f(z2)f(z_1)=f(z_2). Since z1≠z2z_1\neq z_2, this contradicts injectivity.

Case 3: pole. This is the only remaining possibility. Write f(z)=∑k≥0akzkf(z)=\sum_{k\ge 0} a_k z^k, valid on all of C\mathbb{C}. Then

g(w)=∑k≥0akw−k,w≠0,g(w) = \sum_{k\ge 0} a_k w^{-k}, \qquad w \neq 0,

which is the Laurent expansion of gg at 00. A pole of order nn at 00 means ak=0a_k=0 for all k>nk>n and an≠0a_n\ne 0. Hence ff is a polynomial of degree n≥1n\ge 1.

Finishing: an injective polynomial has degree 1. Consider p(z)=f(z)−f(0)p(z)=f(z)-f(0), a polynomial of degree nn.

  • By the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, pp has nn roots counted with multiplicity.
  • By injectivity, f(z)=f(0)f(z)=f(0) only at z=0z=0, so z=0z=0 is the only root.
  • Therefore p(z)=anznp(z)=a_n z^n, that is, f(z)=anzn+f(0)f(z)=a_n z^n + f(0).

If n≥2n\ge 2, let ω=e2πi/n≠1\omega=e^{2\pi i/n}\neq 1. Then f(ω)=an+f(0)=f(1)f(\omega)=a_n+f(0)=f(1), which contradicts injectivity. Hence n=1n=1 and

f(z)=az+b,a≠0.■f(z)=az+b,\qquad a\neq 0. \qquad\blacksquare

Remarks

  • Alternative ending. An injective holomorphic function has f′≠0f'\neq 0 everywhere, since near a zero of f′f' of order mm the map is (m+1)(m+1)-to-11. A polynomial with nowhere-vanishing derivative must have constant derivative, so its degree is 1.
  • The bigger picture. Combined with the analogous fact on the Riemann sphere, this shows Aut⁡(C^)\operatorname{Aut}(\hat{\mathbb{C}}) is the Möbius group. Also, Aut⁡(C)\operatorname{Aut}(\mathbb{C}) is the subgroup of Möbius maps fixing ∞\infty. This is one leg of the classical trichotomy C^\hat{\mathbb{C}}, C\mathbb{C}, D\mathbb{D} in uniformization.
  • The general lesson. "Analyze the singularity at ∞\infty" is a powerful technique. Liouville's theorem, the fact that entire functions of polynomial growth are polynomials, and this result are all instances of it.

Source: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 3, Exercise 14

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 3, Exercise 14Edit on GitHub ↗