The Plane Cannot Be Sliced into Circles
A circle here means an ordinary round circle with radius . It is a curve, not a filled disk.
Question. Can the plane be written as a union of pairwise disjoint circles?
Prove your answer.
(Bonus to think about afterwards: what happens in ?)
Field: Topology (compactness / nested sets in the plane)
Why it's interesting: The question sounds like it should need heavy machinery, such as the Euler characteristic or a fixed-point theorem. In fact it falls to a five-line argument using only nested compact sets. The contrast with makes it more striking: three-space can be partitioned into disjoint circles.
Tags: compactness, nested sets, Cantor intersection theorem, partitions, folklore
Difficulty: 2 / 5
Answer: The Plane Cannot Be Sliced into Circles
Key Idea / Intuition
Suppose such a partition existed. Pick any circle and look at its center. The circle through that center is trapped inside the first disk, and it has at most half the radius. Repeating this gives a nested sequence of disks shrinking to a single point . The circle through has some fixed positive radius, yet it is trapped inside every one of these ever-smaller disks, which is impossible. Compactness supplies the point , and the shrinking radii defeat its circle.
Formal Proof / Solution
Answer: No.
Suppose is a partition into disjoint circles. For a circle , let denote the closed disk it bounds and its open interior.
Trapping lemma. Let be a circle of the partition and another one with . Then .
Proof. is connected and disjoint from . The complement is the disjoint union of the open sets and . A connected set meeting the first must lie entirely in it.
Step 1: Build a shrinking nested sequence. Start with any circle of the partition, with center and radius .
The center lies on some circle of the partition. Since , the lemma gives .
Now bound the radius of . The point of diametrically opposite is at distance from . It lies strictly inside , so
Also, since , the disk it bounds satisfies .
Repeat this with in place of , and so on. This gives circles in the partition with
Step 2: Find the limit point. The sets are nonempty, compact and nested. By the Cantor intersection theorem, . Since the diameters tend to , the intersection is a single point .
Step 3: Contradiction. The point lies on some circle of the partition, with radius .
For every we have . So , which means . Since meets at , the lemma gives
Hence the diameter of is at most the diameter of :
This contradicts . Therefore no such partition exists.
Remarks
- The same proof works for any Jordan curves whose diameters can be forced to shrink. For partitions into arbitrary simple closed curves, the same nesting idea combined with a Zorn-type or compactness argument still shows that the plane cannot be partitioned into them.
- Removing points helps. The plane minus one point can be partitioned into circles: use the concentric circles around the missing point. The argument above fails here because the nested disks could shrink onto the puncture. The punctured point is exactly the "hole" that compactness was detecting.
- Bonus answer (): Yes, is a disjoint union of round circles. One construction starts by partitioning minus a line into tori, and the leftover points are handled by a clever arrangement. Explicit constructions are due to Szulkin (Amer. Math. Monthly 90, 1983). A transfinite-induction proof also works, even with circles of radius only (ConwayโCroft). The extra dimension gives a circle room to "link" around a point instead of being trapped in a disk around it.
Source: Mathematical folklore; R^3 case: A. Szulkin, 'R^3 is the union of disjoint circles', Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983)