๐Ÿงฎ Brain Teaser

The Plane Cannot Be Sliced into Circles

A circle here means an ordinary round circle {xโˆˆR2:โˆฃxโˆ’cโˆฃ=r}\{x \in \mathbb{R}^2 : |x - c| = r\} with radius r>0r > 0. It is a curve, not a filled disk.

Question. Can the plane R2\mathbb{R}^2 be written as a union of pairwise disjoint circles?

Prove your answer.

(Bonus to think about afterwards: what happens in R3\mathbb{R}^3?)


Field: Topology (compactness / nested sets in the plane)

Why it's interesting: The question sounds like it should need heavy machinery, such as the Euler characteristic or a fixed-point theorem. In fact it falls to a five-line argument using only nested compact sets. The contrast with R3\mathbb{R}^3 makes it more striking: three-space can be partitioned into disjoint circles.

Tags: compactness, nested sets, Cantor intersection theorem, partitions, folklore

Difficulty: 2 / 5

compactnessnested setsCantor intersection theorempartitionfolklore

Answer: The Plane Cannot Be Sliced into Circles

Key Idea / Intuition

Suppose such a partition existed. Pick any circle and look at its center. The circle through that center is trapped inside the first disk, and it has at most half the radius. Repeating this gives a nested sequence of disks shrinking to a single point pp. The circle through pp has some fixed positive radius, yet it is trapped inside every one of these ever-smaller disks, which is impossible. Compactness supplies the point pp, and the shrinking radii defeat its circle.


Formal Proof / Solution

Answer: No.

Suppose R2=โจ†ฮฑCฮฑ\mathbb{R}^2 = \bigsqcup_{\alpha} C_\alpha is a partition into disjoint circles. For a circle CC, let D(C)D(C) denote the closed disk it bounds and intโกD(C)\operatorname{int} D(C) its open interior.

Trapping lemma. Let CC be a circle of the partition and Cโ€ฒC' another one with Cโ€ฒโˆฉintโกD(C)โ‰ โˆ…C' \cap \operatorname{int} D(C) \neq \varnothing. Then Cโ€ฒโŠ‚intโกD(C)C' \subset \operatorname{int} D(C).

Proof. Cโ€ฒC' is connected and disjoint from CC. The complement R2โˆ–C\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus C is the disjoint union of the open sets intโกD(C)\operatorname{int} D(C) and R2โˆ–D(C)\mathbb{R}^2 \setminus D(C). A connected set meeting the first must lie entirely in it. โ–ก\square

Step 1: Build a shrinking nested sequence. Start with any circle C1C_1 of the partition, with center c1c_1 and radius r1r_1.

The center c1c_1 lies on some circle C2C_2 of the partition. Since c1โˆˆintโกD(C1)c_1 \in \operatorname{int} D(C_1), the lemma gives C2โŠ‚intโกD(C1)C_2 \subset \operatorname{int} D(C_1).

Now bound the radius r2r_2 of C2C_2. The point of C2C_2 diametrically opposite c1c_1 is at distance 2r22r_2 from c1c_1. It lies strictly inside D(C1)D(C_1), so 2r2<r1,i.e.r2<12r1.2r_2 < r_1, \qquad\text{i.e.}\qquad r_2 < \tfrac{1}{2} r_1.

Also, since C2โŠ‚intโกD(C1)C_2 \subset \operatorname{int} D(C_1), the disk it bounds satisfies D(C2)โŠ‚intโกD(C1)D(C_2) \subset \operatorname{int} D(C_1).

Repeat this with C2C_2 in place of C1C_1, and so on. This gives circles C1,C2,C3,โ€ฆC_1, C_2, C_3, \dots in the partition with D(C1)โŠƒD(C2)โŠƒD(C3)โŠƒโ‹ฏโ€‰,D(Cn+1)โŠ‚intโกD(Cn),rn<r12nโˆ’1โ†’0.D(C_1) \supset D(C_2) \supset D(C_3) \supset \cdots, \qquad D(C_{n+1}) \subset \operatorname{int} D(C_n), \qquad r_n < \frac{r_1}{2^{n-1}} \to 0.

Step 2: Find the limit point. The sets D(Cn)D(C_n) are nonempty, compact and nested. By the Cantor intersection theorem, โ‹‚nD(Cn)โ‰ โˆ…\bigcap_n D(C_n) \neq \varnothing. Since the diameters tend to 00, the intersection is a single point pp.

Step 3: Contradiction. The point pp lies on some circle CC of the partition, with radius r>0r > 0.

For every nn we have pโˆˆD(Cn+1)โŠ‚intโกD(Cn)p \in D(C_{n+1}) \subset \operatorname{int} D(C_n). So pโˆ‰Cnp \notin C_n, which means Cโ‰ CnC \neq C_n. Since CC meets intโกD(Cn)\operatorname{int} D(C_n) at pp, the lemma gives CโŠ‚intโกD(Cn)forย everyย n.C \subset \operatorname{int} D(C_n) \quad\text{for every } n.

Hence the diameter of CC is at most the diameter of D(Cn)D(C_n): 2rโ‰ค2rnโŸถ0.2r \le 2r_n \longrightarrow 0.

This contradicts r>0r > 0. Therefore no such partition exists. โ– \blacksquare


Remarks

  • The same proof works for any Jordan curves whose diameters can be forced to shrink. For partitions into arbitrary simple closed curves, the same nesting idea combined with a Zorn-type or compactness argument still shows that the plane cannot be partitioned into them.
  • Removing points helps. The plane minus one point can be partitioned into circles: use the concentric circles around the missing point. The argument above fails here because the nested disks could shrink onto the puncture. The punctured point is exactly the "hole" that compactness was detecting.
  • Bonus answer (R3\mathbb{R}^3): Yes, R3\mathbb{R}^3 is a disjoint union of round circles. One construction starts by partitioning R3\mathbb{R}^3 minus a line into tori, and the leftover points are handled by a clever arrangement. Explicit constructions are due to Szulkin (Amer. Math. Monthly 90, 1983). A transfinite-induction proof also works, even with circles of radius 11 only (Conwayโ€“Croft). The extra dimension gives a circle room to "link" around a point instead of being trapped in a disk around it.

Source: Mathematical folklore; R^3 case: A. Szulkin, 'R^3 is the union of disjoint circles', Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983)

Type: topologySource: Mathematical folklore; R^3 case: A. Szulkin, 'R^3 is the union of disjoint circles', Amer. Math. Monthly 90 (1983)Edit on GitHub โ†—