A Compact Space Has No Room for a Proper Isometric Copy of Itself
Let be a metric space. A map is an isometry if
Isometries are always injective and continuous. They need not be surjective.
(a) Prove that if is compact, then every isometry is surjective. Conclude that is a homeomorphism.
(b) Show that compactness cannot be weakened to "complete and bounded." Find a closed, bounded subset of a complete metric space and an isometry that is not onto.
Hint for thinking: For a finite set, an injection from the set to itself is automatically a bijection. Compactness says a space is "approximately finite." What would go wrong if a point were missed by ?
Answer: A Compact Space Has No Room for a Proper Isometric Copy of Itself
Key Idea / Intuition
Suppose an isometry missed some point . Then lies at some positive distance from the image. Push forward repeatedly: . Because is rigid, any two points of this orbit are at least apart, just as is from everything in the image. So we get infinitely many points that are uniformly separated. A compact space cannot hold such a set: every sequence must have a convergent, hence Cauchy, subsequence. This is the metric version of "an injection of a finite set into itself is a bijection."
Formal Proof / Solution
(a) Compactness forces surjectivity
Step 1: The image is closed. An isometry is continuous, since it is -Lipschitz. So is a continuous image of a compact space and is compact. Compact subsets of a metric space are closed, so is closed.
Step 2: A missed point is at positive distance from the image. Suppose for contradiction that some satisfies . The set is open, so there is an with . In other words,
Step 3: The orbit of is -separated. Define and , so . Take indices . Applying the isometry property times gives Since , the point lies in . By Step 2,
Step 4: Contradiction. A compact metric space is sequentially compact, so has a convergent subsequence. A convergent subsequence is Cauchy, so two of its terms would be closer than . This contradicts Step 3. Hence .
Step 5: is a homeomorphism. is injective, because gives . So is a bijection. Its inverse is also an isometry: So is continuous as well, and is a homeomorphism (in fact a surjective self-isometry). Alternatively, use the general fact that a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism.
(b) Complete and bounded is not enough
Let be the closed unit ball of the Hilbert space . It is closed and bounded in a complete space, so it is itself complete and bounded. Define the right shift
- preserves norms, so . It is linear, so , which makes an isometry.
- Every vector in has first coordinate . So is not in the image.
The proof in (a) fails here exactly as it should. The orbit satisfies for . This is a uniformly separated sequence inside a bounded set, which is possible only because is not compact.
An unbounded example is with . It is a complete space with an isometry that misses .
Remarks
- Source of the trick: this is the "orbit of the hole" argument. The same idea shows that a compact metric space is never isometric to a proper subset of itself.
- A stronger theorem (Freudenthal–Hurewicz): on a compact metric space, any non-contracting map, meaning for all , is automatically a surjective isometry. The proof is a more delicate version of the same compactness idea.
Source: Munkres, Topology (2nd ed.), §28 (Limit Point Compactness), Exercise 6