The Cliff-Hanger
A drunk man stands one step from the edge of a cliff. Each step is independent of all the others. With probability he steps toward the cliff, and with probability he steps away from it. His position is an integer distance from the edge, and he falls as soon as he reaches .
- Take . What is the probability that he eventually falls off the cliff?
- More generally, find the probability of falling as a function of .
You can probably write down a quadratic equation that the answer must satisfy. That equation has two roots, and one of them is always . The real content of the problem is to explain rigorously which root is the correct one.
Field: Probability (random walks, first-passage problems)
Why it's interesting: The man is twice as likely to walk away from the cliff as toward it. Even so, he falls with probability exactly . The solution uses a self-similarity trick that reduces an infinite-state problem to one quadratic equation. It then raises a subtle question that is easy to skip: the equation alone cannot tell you the answer. This "smallest fixed point" phenomenon shows up again in branching processes (extinction probabilities) and in Catalan-number generating functions.
Difficulty: 2 / 5
Source: Mosteller, Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions, Problem 35 ("The Cliff-Hanger").
Answer: The Cliff-Hanger
Key Idea / Intuition
Self-similarity. To fall from distance 2, the man must first get from 2 to 1, and then fall from 1. The walk is translation-invariant, so "getting from 2 to 1" is an exact copy of "getting from 1 to 0". The two stages are also independent. So if is the probability of ever falling from distance 1, the probability of ever falling from distance 2 is .
One-step equation. Conditioning on the first step then gives a quadratic for . Its roots are and .
Choosing the root. The quadratic does not say which root is right. We pin it down by showing that the true probability lies below every nonnegative root. The true probability is built up from below, as the probability of falling within steps for larger and larger . So it lands on the smallest root, not the largest.
Answer. For , the probability of falling is . In general it is .
Formal Proof / Solution
Setup. Let be the probability of ever reaching when starting from position .
Step 1: . Any path from to moves by , so it must pass through .
- Let be the first time the walk hits . Then is the probability of ever moving one unit closer. By translation invariance, this equals .
- By the strong Markov property, the walk after time is a fresh walk started at , independent of the past. It reaches with probability .
Hence . The same argument gives for every .
Step 2: First-step analysis. From position , he falls immediately with probability . Otherwise, with probability , he moves to position . Therefore Factor using : so the roots are
Step 3: Which root? Let be any nonnegative solution of . We claim .
Define as the probability of hitting within steps, starting from . Set for all .
We prove for all and , by induction on .
- Base case . We have , and for .
- Inductive step. For , condition on the first step: For the bound holds trivially.
The events "fall within steps" increase with , and their union is "eventually fall". So by continuity of probability,
Step 4: Conclusion. By Step 2, is itself a root. By Step 3, it is at most every nonnegative root. So is the smallest nonnegative root:
- Part 1. For we get , so .
- Drift toward the cliff or fair walk (). Then , so the smallest root is and he falls with certainty.
- Drift away from the cliff (). He falls with probability . Starting steps away, the probability is .
Remarks.
- At the fall is certain, but the expected time until falling is infinite. This is the classic null-recurrent behaviour of the simple symmetric random walk.
- The equation is exactly the extinction equation of a branching process in which each individual has either children (probability ) or children (probability ). In both settings, the correct answer is the smallest fixed point, and for the same monotone-iteration reason.
Source: Mosteller, Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions, Problem 35 (The Cliff-Hanger)