🧮 Brain Teaser

The Function That Cannot Explode at the Boundary

Let D={z∈C:∣z∣<1}\mathbb{D} = \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| < 1\} be the open unit disk.

In real analysis it is easy to blow up at the edge of a domain. For example, g(x)=11−x2g(x) = \dfrac{1}{1-x^2} is smooth on (−1,1)(-1,1) and g(x)→∞g(x) \to \infty as ∣x∣→1|x| \to 1.

Question. Does there exist a holomorphic function f:D→Cf : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{C} such that

∣f(z)∣→∞as ∣z∣→1−?|f(z)| \to \infty \quad \text{as } |z| \to 1^- ?

Here the limit means: for every M>0M > 0 there is r<1r < 1 such that ∣f(z)∣>M|f(z)| > M whenever r<∣z∣<1r < |z| < 1.

Prove your answer.

Hint (only if you are stuck): What would 1/f1/f look like near the boundary? What could go wrong in the interior?

maximum modulus principleidentity theoremzeros of holomorphic functionsboundary behavior

Answer: The Function That Cannot Explode at the Boundary

Key Idea / Intuition

No such function exists. If ∣f∣|f| became huge all along the boundary, then 1/f1/f would become tiny all along the boundary. By the maximum modulus principle, a holomorphic function that is tiny on the boundary is tiny everywhere inside, so 1/f≡01/f \equiv 0. That is absurd.

The only obstacle is that ff might have zeros, where 1/f1/f is not defined. Blowing up near the boundary forces every zero into a compact set, so there are only finitely many. We can divide them out with a polynomial.

The underlying principle is that holomorphic functions cannot be "all large on the boundary" unless they compensate with zeros inside. Dividing out the zeros removes that compensation.


Formal Proof / Solution

Suppose, for contradiction, that ff is holomorphic on D\mathbb{D} and ∣f(z)∣→∞|f(z)| \to \infty as ∣z∣→1−|z| \to 1^-.

Step 1: ff has only finitely many zeros. Choose r<1r < 1 such that ∣f(z)∣>1|f(z)| > 1 for r<∣z∣<1r < |z| < 1. Then every zero of ff lies in the compact disk D(0,r)‾\overline{D(0,r)}.

Clearly f≢0f \not\equiv 0. By the identity theorem, the zeros of a nonzero holomorphic function have no accumulation point inside D\mathbb{D}. A set with no accumulation point inside a compact subset of D\mathbb{D} is finite. Let the zeros be a1,…,aNa_1, \dots, a_N, listed with multiplicity. Possibly N=0N = 0.

Step 2: Divide out the zeros. Let

P(z)=∏k=1N(z−ak),g(z)=f(z)P(z).P(z) = \prod_{k=1}^N (z - a_k), \qquad g(z) = \frac{f(z)}{P(z)}.

Then gg is holomorphic on D\mathbb{D}, since its singularities are removable, and gg has no zeros in D\mathbb{D}.

On D\mathbb{D} we have ∣z−ak∣≤2|z - a_k| \le 2, so ∣P(z)∣≤2N|P(z)| \le 2^N. Therefore

∣g(z)∣≥∣f(z)∣2N⟶∞as ∣z∣→1−.|g(z)| \ge \frac{|f(z)|}{2^N} \longrightarrow \infty \quad \text{as } |z| \to 1^-.

Step 3: Apply the maximum modulus principle to h=1/gh = 1/g. Since gg never vanishes, h=1/gh = 1/g is holomorphic on D\mathbb{D}. Also ∣h(z)∣→0|h(z)| \to 0 as ∣z∣→1−|z| \to 1^-.

Fix any z0∈Dz_0 \in \mathbb{D} and any ε>0\varepsilon > 0. Choose ρ\rho with ∣z0∣<ρ<1|z_0| < \rho < 1 such that ∣h(z)∣<ε|h(z)| < \varepsilon on the circle ∣z∣=ρ|z| = \rho. By the maximum modulus principle on the closed disk D(0,ρ)‾\overline{D(0,\rho)},

∣h(z0)∣≤max⁡∣z∣=ρ∣h(z)∣<ε.|h(z_0)| \le \max_{|z| = \rho} |h(z)| < \varepsilon.

Since ε\varepsilon was arbitrary, h(z0)=0h(z_0) = 0. Since z0z_0 was arbitrary, h≡0h \equiv 0.

Step 4: Contradiction. This is impossible, because h=1/gh = 1/g satisfies h(z) g(z)=1h(z)\,g(z) = 1 and so never vanishes. Hence no such ff exists. ■\blacksquare


Remarks

  • The same proof works on any bounded domain Ω\Omega. No holomorphic function on Ω\Omega can tend to ∞\infty at every boundary point. Boundedness of Ω\Omega is what keeps ∣P∣|P| bounded in Step 2.
  • The contrast with C\mathbb{C}. On the whole plane, the "boundary" is the point ∞\infty, and the polynomial p(z)=zp(z) = z does satisfy ∣p(z)∣→∞|p(z)| \to \infty. In fact, the entire functions with ∣f∣→∞|f| \to \infty at ∞\infty are exactly the non-constant polynomials. The disk has too much boundary for this to happen.
  • The real-variable contrast. 1/(1−x2)1/(1-x^2) on (−1,1)(-1,1) works because real-smooth functions obey no maximum principle. Rigidity is what separates "holomorphic" from merely "smooth."
  • What does exist. f(z)=1/(1−z)f(z) = 1/(1-z) blows up at a single boundary point. Lacunary series such as ∑z2n\sum z^{2^n} blow up along a dense set of radii. But no holomorphic function can blow up along the entire boundary at once.

Source: Folklore (classic application of the maximum modulus principle)

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Folklore (classic application of the maximum modulus principle)Edit on GitHub ↗