The Function That Cannot Explode at the Boundary
Let be the open unit disk.
In real analysis it is easy to blow up at the edge of a domain. For example, is smooth on and as .
Question. Does there exist a holomorphic function such that
Here the limit means: for every there is such that whenever .
Prove your answer.
Hint (only if you are stuck): What would look like near the boundary? What could go wrong in the interior?
Answer: The Function That Cannot Explode at the Boundary
Key Idea / Intuition
No such function exists. If became huge all along the boundary, then would become tiny all along the boundary. By the maximum modulus principle, a holomorphic function that is tiny on the boundary is tiny everywhere inside, so . That is absurd.
The only obstacle is that might have zeros, where is not defined. Blowing up near the boundary forces every zero into a compact set, so there are only finitely many. We can divide them out with a polynomial.
The underlying principle is that holomorphic functions cannot be "all large on the boundary" unless they compensate with zeros inside. Dividing out the zeros removes that compensation.
Formal Proof / Solution
Suppose, for contradiction, that is holomorphic on and as .
Step 1: has only finitely many zeros. Choose such that for . Then every zero of lies in the compact disk .
Clearly . By the identity theorem, the zeros of a nonzero holomorphic function have no accumulation point inside . A set with no accumulation point inside a compact subset of is finite. Let the zeros be , listed with multiplicity. Possibly .
Step 2: Divide out the zeros. Let
Then is holomorphic on , since its singularities are removable, and has no zeros in .
On we have , so . Therefore
Step 3: Apply the maximum modulus principle to . Since never vanishes, is holomorphic on . Also as .
Fix any and any . Choose with such that on the circle . By the maximum modulus principle on the closed disk ,
Since was arbitrary, . Since was arbitrary, .
Step 4: Contradiction. This is impossible, because satisfies and so never vanishes. Hence no such exists.
Remarks
- The same proof works on any bounded domain . No holomorphic function on can tend to at every boundary point. Boundedness of is what keeps bounded in Step 2.
- The contrast with . On the whole plane, the "boundary" is the point , and the polynomial does satisfy . In fact, the entire functions with at are exactly the non-constant polynomials. The disk has too much boundary for this to happen.
- The real-variable contrast. on works because real-smooth functions obey no maximum principle. Rigidity is what separates "holomorphic" from merely "smooth."
- What does exist. blows up at a single boundary point. Lacunary series such as blow up along a dense set of radii. But no holomorphic function can blow up along the entire boundary at once.
Source: Folklore (classic application of the maximum modulus principle)