๐Ÿงฎ Brain Teaser

The Compact Space That Cannot Be Hausdorff

Let XX be an infinite set equipped with the cofinite topology: a set UโІXU \subseteq X is open if and only if U=โˆ…U = \emptyset or Xโˆ–UX \setminus U is finite.

(a) Show that XX is compact.

(b) Show that XX is not Hausdorff (when โˆฃXโˆฃ|X| is infinite).

(c) Now let f:Xโ†’Yf: X \to Y be a continuous bijection from (X,Tcofinite)(X, \mathcal{T}_{\text{cofinite}}) to a Hausdorff space YY. What can you conclude about ff, and why?

cofinite topologycompactnessHausdorffhomeomorphismcompact-to-Hausdorff

Answer: Cofinite Topology: Compact but Not Hausdorff

Key Idea / Intuition

The cofinite topology is the "minimal" topology that makes all finite sets closed. Any open cover of an infinite cofinite space can be collapsed to a single open set โ€” because the first open set you pick already covers all but finitely many points, and a finite family handles the rest. This gives compactness almost for free.

For Hausdorff failure: two points cannot be separated because any two nonempty open sets must intersect (their complements are finite, so they cannot partition an infinite space).

Part (c) illustrates a fundamental theorem: a continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is automatically a homeomorphism. The cofinite topology example makes this vivid.


Formal Proof / Solution

Part (a): XX is compact

Let {Uฮฑ}\{U_\alpha\} be an open cover of XX. Pick any one nonempty set Uฮฑ0U_{\alpha_0} from the cover. By definition of the cofinite topology, Xโˆ–Uฮฑ0X \setminus U_{\alpha_0} is finite, say Xโˆ–Uฮฑ0={x1,โ€ฆ,xn}X \setminus U_{\alpha_0} = \{x_1, \ldots, x_n\}.

For each xix_i, pick some UฮฑiU_{\alpha_i} from the cover containing xix_i. Then

X=Uฮฑ0โˆชUฮฑ1โˆชโ‹ฏโˆชUฮฑnX = U_{\alpha_0} \cup U_{\alpha_1} \cup \cdots \cup U_{\alpha_n}

is a finite subcover. โ– \blacksquare


Part (b): XX is not Hausdorff

Take any two distinct points x,yโˆˆXx, y \in X. Suppose Uโˆ‹xU \ni x and Vโˆ‹yV \ni y are open sets. Since XX is infinite and both Xโˆ–UX \setminus U and Xโˆ–VX \setminus V are finite,

Xโˆ–(UโˆฉV)=(Xโˆ–U)โˆช(Xโˆ–V)X \setminus (U \cap V) = (X \setminus U) \cup (X \setminus V)

is a finite union of finite sets, hence finite. Since XX is infinite, UโˆฉVU \cap V must be infinite, in particular nonempty.

Therefore no two points can be separated by disjoint open sets, so XX is not Hausdorff. โ– \blacksquare


Part (c): ff must be a homeomorphism

Theorem (standard): A continuous bijection from a compact space to a Hausdorff space is a homeomorphism.

Proof: It suffices to show ff is a closed map (then fโˆ’1f^{-1} is continuous).

Let CโІXC \subseteq X be closed. Since XX is compact and CC is a closed subset of a compact space, CC is compact. The continuous image of a compact set is compact, so f(C)f(C) is compact in YY. Since YY is Hausdorff, every compact subset of a Hausdorff space is closed. Hence f(C)f(C) is closed in YY. โ– \blacksquare

Consequence for our example: The cofinite topology on an infinite set XX cannot be homeomorphic to any Hausdorff topology on XX via the identity map, since the identity from (X,Tcofinite)(X, \mathcal{T}_{\text{cofinite}}) to (X,Tdiscrete)(X, \mathcal{T}_{\text{discrete}}) (which is Hausdorff) is continuous (every cofinite-open set is discrete-open) and bijective, yet its inverse (identity from discrete to cofinite) is not continuous โ€” sending a non-cofinite open set to something not open. This is consistent: compact โ†’ฬธ\not\to Hausdorff here because the discrete topology on an infinite set is not compact.

The deep takeaway: compact + Hausdorff is a "just right" pairing โ€” any continuous bijection between such spaces is rigid (a homeomorphism), leaving no room for strictly coarser or finer topologies.

Source: Topology (Munkres), Chapter 3 & 4; folklore

Type: topologySource: Topology (Munkres), Chapter 3 & 4; folkloreEdit on GitHub โ†—