The Posterior That Remembers Too Little: Jeffreys Prior Invariance
Suppose you observe and want to place a prior on .
A colleague suggests using the uniform prior , arguing it is "non-informative." But then you reparametrize: let , the arcsine transform. Your colleague applies the uniform prior to instead.
(a) Show that the two priors — uniform on vs. uniform on — are not the same (i.e., a uniform prior on does not correspond to a uniform prior on ).
(b) The Jeffreys prior is defined as , where is the Fisher information. Compute the Jeffreys prior for in the binomial model, and show it is .
(c) Show that the Jeffreys prior is reparametrization invariant: if is a smooth bijection and , then the induced prior on is also the Jeffreys prior for .
Why does this matter? It means Jeffreys prior gives the same "non-informative" answer regardless of how you parametrize the problem — something the flat prior catastrophically fails to do.
Answer: 2026-09-20_am
Key Idea / Intuition
A "flat" prior is not a coordinate-free notion: flatness in one parametrization becomes a non-flat (informative) prior in another. The Jeffreys prior is the unique (up to normalization) prior that is invariant under smooth reparametrization, because it is built from the Fisher information, which transforms contravariantly in exactly the right way to cancel the Jacobian. Think of it as the "natural volume form" on the parameter space induced by the statistical model.
Formal Proof / Solution
Part (a): Uniform on ≠ Uniform on
Let , so .
If , then the density of is obtained by the change of variables:
We compute: , so .
Thus:
This is not uniform on — it peaks at (i.e., ) and vanishes at the endpoints. So the two priors are genuinely different.
Part (b): Jeffreys Prior for the Binomial is Beta(1/2, 1/2)
For , the log-likelihood is:
The Fisher information is:
We compute:
Taking expectation with :
Therefore the Jeffreys prior is:
This is exactly the density (up to normalization).
Sanity check: Beta is the arcsine distribution, which concentrates near and — reflecting genuine uncertainty about extreme values, unlike the flat prior which assigns equal weight everywhere.
Part (c): Reparametrization Invariance of the Jeffreys Prior
Let be a smooth bijection. The Fisher information transforms as:
because the score function , so its variance picks up the square of the Jacobian.
The Jeffreys prior on induced from via change of variables is:
But the Jeffreys prior directly defined in the parametrization is:
These are identical.
The Jacobian from the change-of-variables formula exactly cancels the Jacobian arising in the Fisher information transformation — a perfect algebraic conspiracy that makes the Jeffreys prior the canonical "non-informative" prior.
Summary table:
| Property | Flat Prior | Jeffreys Prior | |---|---|---| | Reparametrization invariant | ✗ | ✓ | | Binomial model | | | | Interpretation | Uniform in | Natural volume form |
Written to: questions/2026-08-17_am.md | Answer in: questions/2026-08-17_am_answer.md