The Entire Function That Squares to Another
Let be an entire function satisfying
for all . Does such exist?
Answer: The Entire Function That Squares to Another
Key Idea / Intuition
The function has two zeros, at and . If , then must vanish at these points. But near each zero of (which is a simple zero), would have to be a "half-zero" — a zero of order — which cannot be holomorphic. More precisely, the issue is topological: the function changes sign as you loop around one of its zeros, so there is no consistent holomorphic square root globally on .
Formal Proof / Solution
Suppose for contradiction that such an entire exists with .
Step 1: Zeros of .
At : we have , so . Similarly .
Write . Both zeros are simple (order 1). Since , the order of vanishing satisfies , which is impossible for a holomorphic function (orders must be non-negative integers).
Conclusion from Step 1: No entire can satisfy .
Alternative (topological) argument: Suppose such is entire (hence continuous). Consider the loop for , which winds once around both and together. Actually, let us use a smaller loop.
Consider winding once around (with small enough to exclude ). Along ,
Near , we have (winds once around 0) while (nonzero, winds zero times). So winds once around 0.
But winds an even number of times around 0 for any closed curve (since winding number of is twice the winding number of ). Contradiction.
More precisely: The winding number of around 0 equals , which is not an integer — impossible for a continuous closed curve.
Summary: No entire function satisfies .
The obstruction is that has simple zeros, so its square root would require a branch cut; there is no single-valued holomorphic square root of on any domain that includes both . (By contrast, restricted to the right half-plane does admit a holomorphic square root, since you can avoid the branch cut.)
Remark: If instead the equation were , then works (an entire function). The key difference is that even-order zeros allow holomorphic square roots, but odd-order zeros do not.