The Ballot Box Surprise: Ties in Matching Pennies
Players A and B flip a fair coin times. They tally their gains and losses: A wins a point on heads, B wins a point on tails. After the first flip, what is the probability that at no point during the remaining flips does the score return to a tie (0-0)?
For concreteness, compute this for (), then state the general formula.
Answer: Ties in Matching Pennies
Key Idea / Intuition
After the first flip, one player is ahead by 1. For the score to never return to even, the leading player must stay strictly ahead the entire time — this is exactly the ballot problem in disguise. The key insight is a reflection/symmetry argument: sequences that do reach a tie can be paired with sequences that don't in a way that lets us count exactly. Surprisingly, the probability depends only on the binomial coefficient , and it equals the same value for and .
Formal Proof / Solution
Setup. We have flips. After the first flip (say A is ahead), we need A to stay strictly ahead for all remaining flips. By symmetry, the probability doesn't depend on who wins the first flip.
Reduction to ballot problem. After flip 1, A leads 1–0. We need: among all remaining flips, A never drops to the level of B. This is equivalent to asking: in a sequence of coin flips (each ±1), a running sum starting at +1 never hits 0.
Counting via the ballot problem result.
The full flips produce a sequence of values. Define = cumulative score difference (A minus B) after flips, with .
The probability that A leads B throughout (i.e., for all ) equals, by the ballot problem:
But we want: after the first flip, never a tie. So we want for , given that (or , by symmetry — the condition is the same).
Direct computation using Mosteller's formula. The probability of no tie after the first flip, over all flips, is:
The equally likely sequences of heads and tails... actually let = number of heads for A in flips, .
- If (no tie possible at end): by the ballot problem, .
- So for .
- If : a tie must occur, so .
By symmetry and careful summation (as worked out by Mosteller), this simplifies beautifully to:
Verification for ():
Let's verify by enumeration. The 16 equally likely sequences (A = heads, B = tails):
| Sequence | Score after each flip | Tie after flip 1? | |---|---|---| | AAAA | 1,2,3,4 | No ✓ | | AAAB | 1,2,3,2 | No ✓ | | AABA | 1,2,1,2 | No ✓ | | AABB | 1,2,1,0 | Tie | | ABAA | 1,0,... | Tie | | ABAB | 1,0,... | Tie | | ABBA | 1,0,... | Tie | | ABBB | 1,0,... | Tie | | BAAA | -1,0,... | Tie | | BAAB | -1,0,... | Tie | | BABA | -1,0,... | Tie | | BABB | -1,0,... | Tie | | BBAA | -1,-2,-1,0 | Tie | | BBAB | -1,-2,-1,-2 | No ✓ | | BBBA | -1,-2,-3,-2 | No ✓ | | BBBB | -1,-2,-3,-4 | No ✓ |
Sequences with no tie: AAAA, AAAB, AABA, BBAB, BBBA, BBBB → 6 sequences.
The beautiful surprise: The answer is exactly the probability that in fair coin flips, exactly are heads — the central binomial probability. And remarkably, the same probability holds for (an odd number of flips).
Source: Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions, Frederick Mosteller, Problem 23