🧮 Brain Teaser

The Casorati–Weierstrass Converse: What Kind of Singularity Am I?

Suppose ff is analytic on the punctured disk 0<∣z∣<10 < |z| < 1 and satisfies

∣f(z)∣≤C∣z∣3/2|f(z)| \leq \frac{C}{|z|^{3/2}}

for some constant C>0C > 0 and all zz in the punctured disk.

Question: What can you conclude about the nature of the singularity of ff at z=0z = 0? Is z=0z = 0 a removable singularity, a pole, or an essential singularity? If it is a pole, what is its order?

removable singularitypoleRiemann removable singularity theoremLaurent seriesgrowth estimates

Answer: Growth Bound Forces Singularity Type

Key Idea / Intuition

The growth rate of ∣f(z)∣|f(z)| near a singularity is the fingerprint of what kind of singularity it is. A pole of order nn behaves exactly like 1/∣z∣n1/|z|^n near 00. An essential singularity has no definite growth rate (it oscillates wildly). A removable singularity stays bounded. Here, ∣f(z)∣≤C/∣z∣3/2|f(z)| \leq C/|z|^{3/2} tells us ff blows up no faster than ∣z∣−3/2|z|^{-3/2} — but 3/23/2 is not an integer! Poles have integer orders. So the singularity cannot be a pole of any integer order. But it also cannot be essential (essential singularities are not bounded by any power of 1/∣z∣1/|z|). The key resolution: multiplying by z2z^2 makes the product bounded near 00, so the singularity of z2f(z)z^2 f(z) is removable — and working backward pins down exactly what ff must look like.


Formal Proof / Solution

Step 1: Rule out essential singularity.

Near an essential singularity, by Casorati–Weierstrass, ff takes values dense in C\mathbb{C}; in particular it cannot satisfy ∣f(z)∣≤C∣z∣−3/2|f(z)| \leq C|z|^{-3/2} for small ∣z∣|z| (a controlled growth bound). So z=0z = 0 is not an essential singularity.

Step 2: Consider g(z)=z2f(z)g(z) = z^2 f(z).

By hypothesis, ∣g(z)∣=∣z∣2∣f(z)∣≤C∣z∣2−3/2=C∣z∣1/2→0as z→0.|g(z)| = |z|^2 |f(z)| \leq C |z|^{2 - 3/2} = C |z|^{1/2} \to 0 \quad \text{as } z \to 0.

So g(z)→0g(z) \to 0 as z→0z \to 0. Since gg is analytic on 0<∣z∣<10 < |z| < 1 and bounded near 00, by Riemann's removable singularity theorem, gg extends to an analytic function on the full disk ∣z∣<1|z| < 1 with g(0)=0g(0) = 0.

Step 3: Determine ff.

Since g(0)=0g(0) = 0 and gg is analytic, we can write g(z)=zkh(z)g(z) = z^k h(z) for some integer k≥1k \geq 1 and hh analytic with h(0)≠0h(0) \neq 0.

Therefore f(z)=g(z)z2=zk−2h(z).f(z) = \frac{g(z)}{z^2} = z^{k-2} h(z).

  • If k≥2k \geq 2: then f(z)=zk−2h(z)f(z) = z^{k-2} h(z) extends to an analytic function at 00 (removable singularity).
  • If k=1k = 1: then f(z)=z−1h(z)f(z) = z^{-1} h(z), a pole of order 1 (simple pole).

Step 4: Check consistency with the growth bound.

  • A pole of order nn satisfies ∣f(z)∣∼C∣z∣−n|f(z)| \sim C|z|^{-n} near 00.
  • The bound ∣f(z)∣≤C∣z∣−3/2|f(z)| \leq C|z|^{-3/2} is satisfied by poles of order n≤3/2n \leq 3/2, i.e., n≤1n \leq 1 (since nn must be a non-negative integer).

So ff has either:

  • A removable singularity at z=0z = 0, or
  • A pole of order 1 (simple pole) at z=0z = 0.

Conclusion:

z=0 is either a removable singularity or a simple pole.\boxed{z = 0 \text{ is either a removable singularity or a simple pole.}}

The bound ∣f(z)∣=O(∣z∣−3/2)|f(z)| = O(|z|^{-3/2}) is not tight enough to force a pole, but it rules out poles of order ≥2\geq 2 and rules out essential singularities entirely. The precise answer: the order of the singularity is at most 1.

Elegant takeaway: The non-integer exponent 3/23/2 is the surprise — it forces the singularity to be "between" a simple pole and a removable singularity, and the argument via z2f(z)z^2 f(z) cleanly resolves this.

Source: Mathematical folklore / standard complex analysis curriculum

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Mathematical folklore / standard complex analysis curriculumEdit on GitHub ↗