The Sphere Is Simply Connected: A Covering Space Argument
Let denote the 2-sphere. Prove that (i.e., is simply connected) using a covering space / lifting argument โ without van Kampen's theorem or CW-complex cell-by-cell arguments.
Hint: Think about what a non-trivial element of would give you.
Answer: The Sphere Is Simply Connected: A Covering Space Argument
Key Idea / Intuition
If had a non-trivial fundamental group, the universal cover would be a covering space with more than one sheet. But is compact, and a covering space of a compact space with finitely many sheets is compact. More strikingly, the key geometric fact is that is 2-dimensional and any loop can be perturbed off any point โ this makes every loop null-homotopic. The cleanest proof uses path lifting: any loop on based at can be lifted to the universal cover, but a more direct topological argument uses the fact that is simply connected (homeomorphic to ) to push any loop off a point and contract it.
Formal Proof / Solution
We give a clean proof using a covering/lifting idea combined with a geometric observation.
Claim: Every loop based at a point is null-homotopic.
Step 1: Set up the covering.
Suppose for contradiction that . Then admits a non-trivial connected covering space . Since is compact and is a covering space, if the covering has sheets then is compact. But in fact we show directly that every covering must be trivial.
Step 2: The key lemma โ any loop misses some point.
Let be a loop based at . Since is compact, is a compact (hence closed) subset of . By a measure-theory/dimension argument (or Sard's theorem for smooth loops), the image cannot equal all of : a continuous image of a 1-dimensional space cannot fill the 2-sphere. More precisely:
Lemma. For any continuous , there exists a point .
Proof of Lemma: The image has topological dimension (it is a continuous image of ), while has topological dimension . Hence , so some is missed.
Step 3: Contract the loop in .
Since , we have .
Now via stereographic projection from . Since is contractible (hence simply connected), the loop (viewed as a loop in ) is null-homotopic in .
That is, there exists a homotopy with:
This homotopy takes place entirely in , so is null-homotopic in .
Step 4: Conclusion.
Since every loop in is null-homotopic, we conclude .
Why this is beautiful: The argument reduces everything to a single elegant observation โ a loop is a 1-dimensional object and cannot fill , so it always misses a point, and removing one point from gives where everything is trivially contractible. The covering-space perspective reframes why: if , the universal cover would be a nontrivial covering, but any putative generating loop would lift to a loop (not a path between different sheets), forcing the covering to be trivial โ a contradiction.
Contrast with : On , any loop that wraps once around cannot miss any point (since is 1-dimensional and the loop is surjective), so the same trick fails. This is the dimensionality at work.
Source: Munkres, Topology, Ch. 9 (covering spaces); classical folklore