The Closed Disk Minus a Boundary Arc: What's the Fundamental Group?
Let be the closed unit disk, and let be a proper closed arc (say, the upper semicircle ).
Consider the space (the closed disk with the upper boundary arc removed).
Question: Is simply connected? Compute and justify your answer.
Answer: Closed Disk Minus a Boundary Arc: Contractible?
Key Idea / Intuition
At first glance, removing an arc from the boundary of a disk feels like it might create a "hole" and a non-trivial fundamental group — after all, we're creating a gap. But the key insight is that deformation retracts onto a contractible space: you can push everything inward away from the missing arc, and the remaining boundary (a single open arc plus the interior) can all be collapsed to a point. The space is actually contractible, so .
The intuition: itself is contractible. Removing a closed arc from the boundary is like having a disk with an "open mouth" — you can still flow everything to the center. The missing arc doesn't create a loop you can't contract, because any loop inside can be pushed into the interior of the disk (away from ) and then contracted there.
Formal Proof / Solution
Step 1: Identify .
So consists of the open interior together with the lower boundary arc (open arc, not including endpoints ) and the two endpoints (which lie on but not in ). More precisely, contains all boundary points not in : the lower open semicircle plus .
Step 2: Show is contractible via an explicit deformation retract.
Define by
- At : (identity).
- At : (contracts everything to the origin).
We must check that for all and .
For : , so lies in the open interior of , which is certainly in .
For : .
So for all , .
Moreover is continuous (it's a product of continuous functions). Therefore is a homotopy from to the constant map at the origin, i.e., is contractible.
Step 3: Conclude.
Since is contractible, all homotopy groups are trivial:
Step 4: Why is removing an interior arc different?
For contrast: if you remove a closed arc in the interior of , the straight-line homotopy might pass through the removed arc (it could hit it on the way to the origin). That situation is genuinely harder. But for a boundary arc, the straight-line collapse to the origin always stays strictly inside the disk.
Conceptual moral: The disk is "fat enough" that removing boundary data doesn't obstruct contraction to the center. The fundamental group cares about holes in the interior — a missing boundary arc is not a hole in this sense.