🧮 Brain Teaser

The Möbius Transformation That Sends the Real Line to Itself

A Möbius transformation is a map of the form

f(z)=az+bcz+d,a,b,c,dC,adbc0.f(z) = \frac{az + b}{cz + d}, \quad a, b, c, d \in \mathbb{C}, \quad ad - bc \neq 0.

Problem: Prove that a Möbius transformation ff maps the real line R{}\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\} to itself (as a set) if and only if a,b,c,da, b, c, d can be chosen to be real (up to an overall complex scalar multiple).

In other words: f(R{})=R{}f(\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}) = \mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\} if and only if there exists λC×\lambda \in \mathbb{C}^\times such that λa,λb,λc,λdR\lambda a, \lambda b, \lambda c, \lambda d \in \mathbb{R}.

Möbius transformationsreal linethree-point determinationPGL2(R)cross-ratio

Answer: The Möbius Transformation That Sends the Real Line to Itself

Key Idea / Intuition

A Möbius transformation is completely determined by its values at three points. The real line contains infinitely many real points, so if ff maps R\mathbb{R} to itself, we can read off the coefficients by evaluating at three convenient real inputs — and the constraints force the coefficients to be (proportionally) real. Conversely, if the coefficients are real, then ff maps reals to reals by direct inspection. The elegance is that the "three-point determination" of Möbius transformations does all the heavy lifting.


Formal Proof / Solution

(\Leftarrow) Real coefficients \Rightarrow real line maps to itself

If a,b,c,dRa, b, c, d \in \mathbb{R} and xRx \in \mathbb{R}, then

f(x)=ax+bcx+dR{}f(x) = \frac{ax+b}{cx+d} \in \mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}

since the numerator and denominator are both real. Also f()=a/cR{}f(\infty) = a/c \in \mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}. So f(R{})R{}f(\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}) \subseteq \mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}. Since ff is a bijection of the Riemann sphere, equality holds. \checkmark


(\Rightarrow) Real line maps to itself \Rightarrow coefficients are proportionally real

Assume f(R{})=R{}f(\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}) = \mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\}.

Step 1: Extract three real values.

Evaluate ff at 0,1,0, 1, \infty:

f(0)=bd=:αR,f()=ac=:βR,f(1)=a+bc+d=:γR.f(0) = \frac{b}{d} =: \alpha \in \mathbb{R}, \qquad f(\infty) = \frac{a}{c} =: \beta \in \mathbb{R}, \qquad f(1) = \frac{a+b}{c+d} =: \gamma \in \mathbb{R}.

(We treat the case where some of these are \infty separately; it only simplifies the argument.)

Step 2: Solve for ratios.

From b/d=αb/d = \alpha we get b=αdb = \alpha d.

From a/c=βa/c = \beta we get a=βca = \beta c.

From (a+b)/(c+d)=γ(a+b)/(c+d) = \gamma:

a+b=γ(c+d)    βc+αd=γc+γd.a + b = \gamma(c + d) \implies \beta c + \alpha d = \gamma c + \gamma d.

Rearranging:

(βγ)c=(γα)d.(\beta - \gamma)c = (\gamma - \alpha)d.

If βγ\beta \neq \gamma (i.e., c0c \neq 0), we may set c=1c = 1 and obtain

d=βγγαR(since α,β,γR).d = \frac{\beta - \gamma}{\gamma - \alpha} \in \mathbb{R} \quad (\text{since } \alpha, \beta, \gamma \in \mathbb{R}).

Then a=βc=βRa = \beta c = \beta \in \mathbb{R} and b=αdRb = \alpha d \in \mathbb{R}.

If β=γ\beta = \gamma, then either α=γ\alpha = \gamma (all three values equal, impossible for a Möbius transformation) or d=0d = 0, in which case b=αd=0b = \alpha d = 0 and we can set c=1c = 1, getting a=βRa = \beta \in \mathbb{R}, b=0b = 0, d=0d = 0, c=1c = 1 — all real. \checkmark

Step 3: Conclusion.

In all cases we find a,b,c,dRa, b, c, d \in \mathbb{R} representing the same transformation (possibly after rescaling by λ=1/d\lambda = 1/d or 1/c1/c). \blacksquare


Remark: A slicker reformulation

A Möbius transformation preserves R{}\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\} if and only if it preserves the cross-ratio of real quadruples, which happens precisely when the transformation matrix (abcd)\begin{pmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{pmatrix} lies in GL2(R)GL_2(\mathbb{R}) (up to complex scalar). This is the group-theoretic way to say the same thing: the stabilizer of R{}\mathbb{R} \cup \{\infty\} inside PGL2(C)PGL_2(\mathbb{C}) is exactly PGL2(R)PGL_2(\mathbb{R}).

Source: Complex Analysis, Stein–Shakarchi, Chapter 8; classical folklore

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Complex Analysis, Stein–Shakarchi, Chapter 8; classical folkloreEdit on GitHub ↗