๐Ÿงฎ Brain Teaser

The Punctured Torus Has a Surprising Fundamental Group

Let T2=S1ร—S1T^2 = S^1 \times S^1 be the torus, and let Tโˆ—2=T2โˆ–{p}T^2_* = T^2 \setminus \{p\} be the torus with one point removed.

Claim: The fundamental group ฯ€1(Tโˆ—2)\pi_1(T^2_*) is a free group on two generators.

This is surprising: the full torus has ฯ€1(T2)โ‰…Zร—Z\pi_1(T^2) \cong \mathbb{Z} \times \mathbb{Z}, which is abelian. But removing a single point makes the fundamental group non-abelian (in fact, free).

Your task: Explain why this is true by constructing an explicit deformation retract of Tโˆ—2T^2_* onto a familiar space whose fundamental group you already know.

fundamental groupdeformation retractfree grouptorusVan Kampen

Answer: Punctured Torus Has Free Fundamental Group

Key Idea / Intuition

Think of the torus as a square with opposite sides identified. When you remove a point from the interior of this square, the punctured square deformation retracts onto its boundary frame โ€” a loop that traces all four edges. After the identifications that define the torus, this boundary becomes exactly the wedge S1โˆจS1S^1 \vee S^1. Since ฯ€1(S1โˆจS1)โ‰…F2\pi_1(S^1 \vee S^1) \cong F_2 (the free group on two generators), the punctured torus has the same fundamental group โ€” and crucially, it is free, hence non-abelian.


Formal Proof / Solution

Step 1: Represent the torus as a square with identifications

Recall that T2T^2 is the quotient of the unit square [0,1]2[0,1]^2 by the equivalence relation

(x,0)โˆผ(x,1),(0,y)โˆผ(1,y).(x,0) \sim (x,1), \quad (0,y) \sim (1,y).

Choose the removed point pp to be the image of an interior point, say (12,12)(\tfrac{1}{2}, \tfrac{1}{2}).

Step 2: Deformation retract the punctured square onto its boundary

The punctured square [0,1]2โˆ–{(12,12)}[0,1]^2 \setminus \{(\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2})\} deformation retracts onto its boundary โˆ‚([0,1]2)\partial([0,1]^2). Concretely: push radially outward from (12,12)(\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2}) toward the nearest boundary point. This is a continuous deformation retraction

rt(x)=(1โˆ’t)x+tโ‹…ฯ(x),tโˆˆ[0,1],r_t(x) = (1-t)x + t \cdot \rho(x), \quad t \in [0,1],

where ฯ(x)\rho(x) denotes the radial projection from (12,12)(\tfrac{1}{2},\tfrac{1}{2}) to โˆ‚([0,1]2)\partial([0,1]^2).

Step 3: Identify what the boundary becomes after quotient

The boundary โˆ‚([0,1]2)\partial([0,1]^2) consists of the four edges of the square. Under the torus identifications:

  • The bottom edge (x,0)(x,0) is identified with the top edge (x,1)(x,1) โ†’ these form one circle (call it aa).
  • The left edge (0,y)(0,y) is identified with the right edge (1,y)(1,y) โ†’ these form another circle (call it bb).
  • The four corners are all identified to a single point โˆ—* .

So the boundary โˆ‚([0,1]2)\partial([0,1]^2) under the quotient becomes two circles glued at a single point: S1โˆจS1S^1 \vee S^1.

Step 4: Conclude about ฯ€1\pi_1

The deformation retract is compatible with the quotient map (since the puncture is in the interior and the retraction is radial), so we get:

Tโˆ—2โ‰ƒS1โˆจS1.T^2_* \simeq S^1 \vee S^1.

By Van Kampen's theorem (or by direct computation),

ฯ€1(S1โˆจS1)โ‰…F2=โŸจa,bโŸฉ,\pi_1(S^1 \vee S^1) \cong F_2 = \langle a, b \rangle,

the free group on two generators.

Step 5: Why the full torus is different

In the full torus, the two loops aa and bb are related by the boundary word abaโˆ’1bโˆ’1=1aba^{-1}b^{-1} = 1 (reading around โˆ‚([0,1]2)\partial([0,1]^2) gives the null-homotopic loop because the boundary bounds the square). This relation forces ab=baab = ba, giving ฯ€1(T2)โ‰…Z2\pi_1(T^2) \cong \mathbb{Z}^2.

When we remove the interior point, the square is no longer present to fill in the commutator loop. The boundary loop abaโˆ’1bโˆ’1aba^{-1}b^{-1} now goes around the puncture and is no longer null-homotopic โ€” it is the generator of ฯ€1\pi_1 around the hole. So the relation disappears, and the group is free.

Summary

ฯ€1(T2โˆ–{p})โ‰…F2=โŸจa,bโŸฉ.\boxed{\pi_1(T^2 \setminus \{p\}) \cong F_2 = \langle a, b \rangle.}

Removing a point from the torus "undoes" the commutativity relation โ€” a beautiful example of how topology can change drastically under small surgery.

Source: Topology (Munkres); Introduction to Topological Manifolds (Lee)

Type: topologySource: Topology (Munkres); Introduction to Topological Manifolds (Lee)Edit on GitHub โ†—