🧮 Brain Teaser

The Torus and the Annulus: A Quotient Surprise

Consider the torus T2=S1×S1T^2 = S^1 \times S^1. Define an equivalence relation \sim on T2T^2 by

(eiθ1,eiθ2)(eiθ1,eiθ2)(e^{i\theta_1}, e^{i\theta_2}) \sim (e^{i\theta_1}, e^{-i\theta_2})

(reflecting the second coordinate), with all other points equivalent only to themselves.

What is the quotient space T2/T^2 / {\sim}?

Identify it as a familiar topological space. Can you prove your answer?

Hint: Think about what happens to each "fiber" {eiθ1}×S1\{e^{i\theta_1}\} \times S^1 under the equivalence relation.

quotient spacetorusannulusfiberidentification space

Answer: The Torus and the Annulus: A Quotient Surprise

Key Idea / Intuition

The torus is a product S1×S1S^1 \times S^1. The equivalence relation only acts on the second S1S^1 factor — it reflects each circle {pt}×S1\{pt\} \times S^1 across the "real axis" by conjugation eiθ2eiθ2e^{i\theta_2} \mapsto e^{-i\theta_2}. Each circle S1S^1 under the reflection θθ\theta \mapsto -\theta collapses to a closed interval [0,π][0, \pi] (since eiθeiθe^{i\theta} \sim e^{-i\theta} identifies antipodal-in-angle points). So the torus becomes a cylinder: a circle's worth of intervals, i.e., S1×[0,π]S1×[0,1]S^1 \times [0, \pi] \cong S^1 \times [0,1].


Formal Proof / Solution

Step 1: Analyze each fiber.

Fix z=eiθ1S1z = e^{i\theta_1} \in S^1. The fiber over zz is {z}×S1\{z\} \times S^1, and the equivalence relation restricts to:

eiθ2eiθ2e^{i\theta_2} \sim e^{-i\theta_2}

on this copy of S1S^1. This is exactly the reflection of the circle across the real axis. The quotient S1/(eiθeiθ)S^1 / (e^{i\theta} \sim e^{-i\theta}) identifies each point with its conjugate.

The map eiθcosθe^{i\theta} \mapsto \cos\theta is a continuous surjection S1[1,1]S^1 \to [-1,1] that identifies exactly eiθe^{i\theta} with eiθe^{-i\theta} (and fixes ±1\pm 1). Since S1S^1 is compact and [1,1][-1,1] is Hausdorff, this is a quotient map, so:

S1/(eiθeiθ)[1,1].S^1 / (e^{i\theta} \sim e^{-i\theta}) \cong [-1, 1].

Step 2: Assemble the quotient.

The total equivalence relation on T2=S1×S1T^2 = S^1 \times S^1 acts as the identity on the first factor and as the reflection on each fiber of the second factor. Therefore the quotient map is:

q:S1×S1S1×[1,1],q(eiθ1,eiθ2)=(eiθ1,cosθ2).q: S^1 \times S^1 \to S^1 \times [-1,1], \qquad q(e^{i\theta_1}, e^{i\theta_2}) = (e^{i\theta_1}, \cos\theta_2).

This map is continuous, surjective, and identifies exactly the pairs (eiθ1,eiθ2)(e^{i\theta_1}, e^{i\theta_2}) and (eiθ1,eiθ2)(e^{i\theta_1}, e^{-i\theta_2}) — which is precisely \sim.

Step 3: Verify it is a quotient map.

Since T2=S1×S1T^2 = S^1 \times S^1 is compact and S1×[1,1]S^1 \times [-1,1] is Hausdorff, any continuous surjection from T2T^2 onto S1×[1,1]S^1 \times [-1,1] that induces the right identification is automatically a quotient map (compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijections on quotients are homeomorphisms).

Conclusion:

T2/    S1×[1,1],T^2 / {\sim} \;\cong\; S^1 \times [-1, 1],

which is the closed annulus (cylinder).

Why this is surprising: The torus is a closed manifold with no boundary. Yet after this simple reflection, the quotient acquires a boundary (the two boundary circles S1×{1}S^1 \times \{-1\} and S1×{1}S^1 \times \{1\}, corresponding to θ2=π\theta_2 = \pi and θ2=0\theta_2 = 0). The "identification" of boundary circles of each fiber creates actual boundary in the quotient — a vivid illustration of how quotient spaces can drastically change topological type.

Type: topologyEdit on GitHub ↗