🧮 Brain Teaser

The Conformal Map That Squares the Disk

Let f:D→Cf: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{C} be holomorphic on the open unit disk D={∣z∣<1}\mathbb{D} = \{|z| < 1\}, continuous on D‾\overline{\mathbb{D}}, with f(0)=0f(0) = 0.

Suppose ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣2|f(z)| \leq |z|^2 for all zz on the unit circle ∣z∣=1|z| = 1.

Prove that ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣2|f(z)| \leq |z|^2 for all z∈Dz \in \mathbb{D}.

Then determine: what are all functions ff achieving equality ∣f(z0)∣=∣z0∣2|f(z_0)| = |z_0|^2 for some z0≠0z_0 \neq 0 inside the disk?

Maximum Modulus PrincipleSchwarz Lemmaremovable singularitydiskequality case

Answer: The Conformal Map That Squares the Disk

Key Idea / Intuition

The hypothesis says ff is "dominated by z2z^2" on the boundary. The natural move is to form the ratio g(z)=f(z)/z2g(z) = f(z)/z^2, which removes the double zero at the origin. This ratio is holomorphic on the punctured disk — and because f(0)=0f(0) = 0 with sufficient vanishing, the singularity at 00 is removable. Then the Maximum Modulus Principle says ∣g∣|g| attains its max on the boundary, where we know ∣g∣≤1|g| \leq 1. Equality inside forces gg to be a constant of modulus 1.


Formal Proof / Solution

Step 1: Form the auxiliary function.

Define g(z)=f(z)z2,z∈D∖{0}.g(z) = \frac{f(z)}{z^2}, \quad z \in \mathbb{D} \setminus \{0\}.

Since f(0)=0f(0) = 0, write f(z)=a1z+a2z2+⋯f(z) = a_1 z + a_2 z^2 + \cdots near 00. Then g(z)=a1z+a2z2+⋯z2=a1z+a2+a3z+⋯g(z) = \frac{a_1 z + a_2 z^2 + \cdots}{z^2} = \frac{a_1}{z} + a_2 + a_3 z + \cdots

For gg to have a removable singularity at 00, we need a1=0a_1 = 0, i.e., f′(0)=0f'(0) = 0.

Wait — do we know this? Not directly. Let's be more careful.

Step 2: Handle the singularity properly.

We know ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣2|f(z)| \leq |z|^2 on ∣z∣=1|z|=1. By the Maximum Modulus Principle applied to ff itself on D‾\overline{\mathbb{D}}, we get ∣f(z)∣≤1|f(z)| \leq 1 for all z∈Dz \in \mathbb{D}. But we can do better.

Consider g(z)=f(z)/z2g(z) = f(z)/z^2 on D∖{0}\mathbb{D}\setminus\{0\}. We claim z=0z=0 is a removable singularity. Indeed, near 00: ∣f(z)∣≤∥f∥∞⋅1⇒∣g(z)∣=∣f(z)∣∣z∣2≤C∣z∣2,|f(z)| \leq \|f\|_\infty \cdot 1 \quad \Rightarrow \quad |g(z)| = \frac{|f(z)|}{|z|^2} \leq \frac{C}{|z|^2}, which seems to blow up. But we can use a refined argument: apply the three-circle theorem or the following direct approach.

Direct approach via Schwarz lemma framework:

Define h(z)=f(z)/zh(z) = f(z)/z for z≠0z \neq 0. Since f(0)=0f(0)=0, the singularity is removable and hh is holomorphic on D\mathbb{D} with h(0)=f′(0)=a1h(0) = f'(0) = a_1. On ∣z∣=1|z|=1: ∣h(z)∣=∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣2=1|h(z)| = |f(z)| \leq |z|^2 = 1. By Maximum Modulus, ∣h(z)∣≤1|h(z)| \leq 1 on all of D\mathbb{D}, so ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣|f(z)| \leq |z|.

Now apply the same trick to hh: on ∣z∣=1|z|=1, ∣h(z)∣=∣f(z)∣/1≤∣z∣2/∣z∣=∣z∣=1|h(z)| = |f(z)|/1 \leq |z|^2 / |z| = |z| = 1. Define k(z)=h(z)/z=f(z)/z2k(z) = h(z)/z = f(z)/z^2 for z≠0z \neq 0. Since ∣h(z)∣≤∣z∣|h(z)| \leq |z| (from above), we have h(0)=0h(0) = 0, so kk extends holomorphically to 00 with k(0)=h′(0)k(0) = h'(0).

On ∣z∣=1|z| = 1: ∣k(z)∣=∣h(z)∣≤1|k(z)| = |h(z)| \leq 1. By Maximum Modulus: ∣k(z)∣≤1for all z∈D.|k(z)| \leq 1 \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{D}.

This gives ∣f(z)∣=∣z∣2∣k(z)∣≤∣z∣2for all z∈D.\boxed{|f(z)| = |z|^2 |k(z)| \leq |z|^2} \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{D}.

Step 3: Equality case.

If ∣f(z0)∣=∣z0∣2|f(z_0)| = |z_0|^2 for some z0≠0z_0 \neq 0, then ∣k(z0)∣=1|k(z_0)| = 1. Since kk is holomorphic on D\mathbb{D} with ∣k∣≤1|k| \leq 1 on the boundary, and ∣k∣|k| attains its maximum value 11 at an interior point z0z_0, the Maximum Modulus Principle forces kk to be a constant: k(z)≡c,∣c∣=1.k(z) \equiv c, \quad |c| = 1.

Therefore: f(z)=cz2,∣c∣=1.f(z) = c z^2, \quad |c| = 1.

Summary:

  • The bound ∣f(z)∣≤∣z∣2|f(z)| \leq |z|^2 propagates from the boundary to the interior via two applications of the Schwarz lemma / Maximum Modulus Principle.
  • Equality at any interior point forces f(z)=eiθz2f(z) = e^{i\theta} z^2 for some real θ\theta.

Source: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 8 exercises (Schwarz Lemma variants)

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 8 exercises (Schwarz Lemma variants)Edit on GitHub ↗