๐Ÿงฎ Brain Teaser

The Reflection Principle for Holomorphic Functions

Let ff be a continuous function on the closed upper half-disk D+โ€พ={z:โˆฃzโˆฃโ‰ค1,ย Im(z)โ‰ฅ0}\overline{D^+} = \{z : |z| \leq 1,\ \text{Im}(z) \geq 0\}, holomorphic on the open upper half-disk D+={z:โˆฃzโˆฃ<1,ย Im(z)>0}D^+ = \{z : |z| < 1,\ \text{Im}(z) > 0\}, and real-valued on the real segment (โˆ’1,1)(-1, 1) (i.e., f(x)โˆˆRf(x) \in \mathbb{R} for xโˆˆ(โˆ’1,1)x \in (-1,1)).

Define the extension: F(z)={f(z)Im(z)โ‰ฅ0,ย โˆฃzโˆฃโ‰ค1f(zห‰)โ€พIm(z)<0,ย โˆฃzโˆฃ<1F(z) = \begin{cases} f(z) & \text{Im}(z) \geq 0,\ |z| \leq 1 \\ \overline{f(\bar{z})} & \text{Im}(z) < 0,\ |z| < 1 \end{cases}

Show that FF is holomorphic on the full open disk D={โˆฃzโˆฃ<1}D = \{|z| < 1\}.

What is the key principle at work, and why does the real-valued condition on the real segment make everything click?

Schwarz reflectionMorera's theoremanalytic continuationCauchy-Riemannsymmetry

Answer: Schwarz Reflection Principle via Morera

Key Idea / Intuition

The idea is beautifully symmetric: a holomorphic function that is real on the real axis must satisfy f(zห‰)โ€พ=f(z)\overline{f(\bar{z})} = f(z), so reflecting zz across the real axis and taking the conjugate of the output gives a consistent extension. The two pieces f(z)f(z) and f(zห‰)โ€พ\overline{f(\bar{z})} agree on the real segment because ff is real there, so there is no jump. By Morera's theorem, continuity across the seam plus holomorphicity on each half is enough to conclude holomorphicity on the whole disk.


Formal Proof / Solution

Step 1: FF is well-defined and continuous on DD.

On the upper half-disk, F=fF = f which is continuous. On the lower half-disk Dโˆ’={โˆฃzโˆฃ<1,ย Im(z)<0}D^- = \{|z|<1,\ \text{Im}(z)<0\}, the map zโ†ฆzห‰z \mapsto \bar{z} is continuous, ff is continuous on D+D^+ (and extends continuously to the real segment), and conjugation is continuous, so zโ†ฆf(zห‰)โ€พz \mapsto \overline{f(\bar{z})} is continuous on Dโˆ’D^-.

On the real segment (โˆ’1,1)(-1,1): as z=xโˆˆRz = x \in \mathbb{R}, f(zห‰)โ€พ=f(x)โ€พ=f(x)โ€พ.\overline{f(\bar{z})} = \overline{f(x)} = \overline{f(x)}. Since f(x)โˆˆRf(x) \in \mathbb{R}, we get f(x)โ€พ=f(x)\overline{f(x)} = f(x), so both definitions agree. Thus FF is continuous on all of DD.

Step 2: f(zห‰)โ€พ\overline{f(\bar{z})} is holomorphic on Dโˆ’D^-.

Let g(z)=f(zห‰)โ€พg(z) = \overline{f(\bar{z})} for zโˆˆDโˆ’z \in D^-. Since zห‰โˆˆD+\bar{z} \in D^+ when zโˆˆDโˆ’z \in D^-, ff is holomorphic there. Check the Cauchyโ€“Riemann equations: if f=u+ivf = u + iv, then g(z)=g(x+iy)=u(x,โˆ’y)โˆ’iv(x,โˆ’y).g(z) = g(x+iy) = u(x,-y) - iv(x,-y).

Let u~(x,y)=u(x,โˆ’y)\tilde{u}(x,y) = u(x,-y) and v~(x,y)=โˆ’v(x,โˆ’y)\tilde{v}(x,y) = -v(x,-y). Since u,vu,v satisfy Cโ€“R on D+D^+: โˆ‚uโˆ‚x=โˆ‚vโˆ‚y,โˆ‚uโˆ‚y=โˆ’โˆ‚vโˆ‚x.\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}, \quad \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}.

Compute (with s=โˆ’y>0s = -y > 0 for zโˆˆDโˆ’z \in D^-): โˆ‚u~โˆ‚x=โˆ‚uโˆ‚x(x,s)=โˆ‚vโˆ‚y(x,s)=โˆ‚v~โˆ‚y,\frac{\partial \tilde{u}}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}(x,s) = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}(x,s) = \frac{\partial \tilde{v}}{\partial y}, โˆ‚u~โˆ‚y=โˆ’โˆ‚uโˆ‚y(x,s)=โˆ‚vโˆ‚x(x,s)=โˆ’โˆ‚v~โˆ‚x.\frac{\partial \tilde{u}}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}(x,s) = \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}(x,s) = -\frac{\partial \tilde{v}}{\partial x}.

So gg satisfies Cโ€“R on Dโˆ’D^-, hence is holomorphic there.

Step 3: Apply Morera's theorem to conclude FF is holomorphic on DD.

Take any triangle TโŠ‚DT \subset D.

  • If TT lies entirely in D+D^+ or entirely in Dโˆ’D^-, then โˆฎโˆ‚TFโ€‰dz=0\oint_{\partial T} F\, dz = 0 by Cauchy's theorem applied to ff or gg respectively.

  • If TT straddles the real axis, split it along the real segment into pieces in D+D^+ and Dโˆ’D^-. On the boundary segment lying on R\mathbb{R}, FF is continuous and the two pieces agree. By a standard limiting argument (or Goursat's theorem for triangles touching the boundary), โˆฎโˆ‚TFโ€‰dz=0\oint_{\partial T} F\, dz = 0 still holds.

Since FF is continuous on DD and โˆฎโˆ‚TFโ€‰dz=0\oint_{\partial T} F\, dz = 0 for every triangle TโŠ‚DT \subset D, Morera's theorem implies FF is holomorphic on DD. โ– \blacksquare


The punchline: The condition "ff is real on (โˆ’1,1)(-1,1)" is precisely what forces continuity across the real axis. Without it, FF would have a jump discontinuity there and the argument collapses. With it, the Schwarz Reflection Principle gives a free analytic continuation โ€” the real axis acts as a mirror, and the function's values on one side completely determine its values on the other.

Bonus formula: The reflection principle gives the identity f(zห‰)=f(z)โ€พf(\bar{z}) = \overline{f(z)} for all zz in the upper half-disk, a beautiful symmetry that is forced entirely by the real-valuedness on the boundary segment.

Source: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 2; classical folklore

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 2; classical folkloreEdit on GitHub โ†—