🧮 Brain Teaser

The Holomorphic Function Determined by Its Real Part

Let f=u+ivf = u + iv be a holomorphic function on a connected open domain Ω⊆C\Omega \subseteq \mathbb{C}. Suppose that the real part u(x,y)u(x, y) is identically zero on Ω\Omega.

Prove that ff is constant on Ω\Omega.

Now suppose instead that ∣f(z)∣|f(z)| is constant on Ω\Omega. Must ff be constant?

Cauchy-Riemann equationsholomorphic functionsrigidityconnectednessconstant functions

Answer: The Holomorphic Function Determined by Its Real Part

Key Idea / Intuition

The Cauchy–Riemann equations are the bridge between real and complex information: they link partial derivatives of uu and vv so tightly that knowing u≡0u \equiv 0 forces all partial derivatives of vv to vanish too, making vv (and hence ff) locally constant, and by connectedness, globally constant.

For the modulus case, if ∣f∣2=u2+v2=c|f|^2 = u^2 + v^2 = c, differentiating this real constraint twice (once in xx, once in yy) and invoking Cauchy–Riemann creates a system of equations for uu and vv that forces their gradients to vanish — unless c=0c = 0, which forces f≡0f \equiv 0 directly.


Formal Proof / Solution

Part 1: u≡0u \equiv 0 implies ff is constant

Since f=u+ivf = u + iv is holomorphic on Ω\Omega, the Cauchy–Riemann equations hold: ∂u∂x=∂v∂y,∂u∂y=−∂v∂x.\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial v}{\partial y}, \qquad \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = -\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}.

If u≡0u \equiv 0 on Ω\Omega, then ∂u∂x=∂u∂y=0\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = 0 everywhere. By Cauchy–Riemann: ∂v∂y=∂u∂x=0,∂v∂x=−∂u∂y=0.\frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} = 0, \qquad \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} = -\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} = 0.

So ∇v≡0\nabla v \equiv 0 on Ω\Omega. Since Ω\Omega is connected, vv is constant, say v≡cv \equiv c. Therefore f=0+icf = 0 + ic is constant. ■\blacksquare


Part 2: ∣f∣|f| constant implies ff is constant

Suppose ∣f(z)∣2=u2+v2≡c2|f(z)|^2 = u^2 + v^2 \equiv c^2 for some c≥0c \geq 0 on Ω\Omega.

Case 1: c=0c = 0. Then u2+v2=0u^2 + v^2 = 0, so u=v=0u = v = 0 everywhere, and f≡0f \equiv 0.

Case 2: c>0c > 0. Differentiate u2+v2=c2u^2 + v^2 = c^2 with respect to xx and yy: u ux+v vx=0,u uy+v vy=0.u\,u_x + v\,v_x = 0, \qquad u\,u_y + v\,v_y = 0.

Apply Cauchy–Riemann (ux=vyu_x = v_y, uy=−vxu_y = -v_x): u ux+v vx=0⇒u vy−v uy=0(using CR on the first)u\,u_x + v\,v_x = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad u\,v_y - v\,u_y = 0 \quad \text{(using CR on the first)}

More directly, substitute CR into the two equations: u\,u_x + v\,v_x = 0 \tag{i} u\,u_y + v\,v_y = 0 \quad \Rightarrow \quad -u\,v_x + v\,u_x = 0 \tag{ii}

This is a linear system in (ux,vx)(u_x, v_x): (uvv−u)(uxvx)=(00).\begin{pmatrix} u & v \\ v & -u \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} u_x \\ v_x \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}.

The determinant of the coefficient matrix is −(u2+v2)=−c2≠0-(u^2 + v^2) = -c^2 \neq 0. So the only solution is ux=vx=0u_x = v_x = 0. By Cauchy–Riemann, uy=vy=0u_y = v_y = 0 as well.

Thus ∇u=∇v=0\nabla u = \nabla v = 0 on Ω\Omega, and by connectedness, uu and vv are both constant. So ff is constant. ■\blacksquare


Summary

| Condition | Forces | |-----------|--------| | Re(f)=0\text{Re}(f) = 0 | f≡constf \equiv \text{const} via CR + connectedness | | ∣f∣=const|f| = \text{const} | f≡constf \equiv \text{const} via CR + linear algebra |

Both results highlight the same theme: holomorphic functions are rigid — real data plus the Cauchy–Riemann constraint pins down the complex function completely.

Source: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 1

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 1Edit on GitHub ↗