๐Ÿงฎ Brain Teaser

The Zeros That Refuse to Accumulate

Let ff be analytic on the open unit disk D={โˆฃzโˆฃ<1}\mathbb{D} = \{|z| < 1\}, and suppose ff is not identically zero.

Define the sequence zn=1โˆ’1nz_n = 1 - \frac{1}{n} for n=1,2,3,โ€ฆn = 1, 2, 3, \ldots

Can f(zn)=0f(z_n) = 0 for all nn?

Now consider a different sequence: let wnw_n be any sequence of points in D\mathbb{D} with โˆฃwnโˆฃโ†’1|w_n| \to 1 (approaching the boundary, but not necessarily along a single radial direction).

Can f(wn)=0f(w_n) = 0 for all nn, with ff not identically zero?

Decide each case, and explain precisely why one is impossible and the other is possible โ€” and construct an explicit example for the possible case.

Identity TheoremBlaschke productzeros of analytic functionsboundary behavior

Answer: The Zeros That Refuse to Accumulate

Key Idea / Intuition

The Identity Theorem says: if the zeros of a non-zero analytic function accumulate at an interior point of the domain, then the function is identically zero. The sequence zn=1โˆ’1/nz_n = 1 - 1/n accumulates at z=1z = 1, which is on the boundary of D\mathbb{D}, not inside it โ€” so the Identity Theorem doesn't apply, and in fact a non-trivial function can vanish on this sequence. For the second case, zeros can accumulate anywhere on the boundary, as long as they don't cluster inside, so a non-zero analytic function can vanish on an arbitrary boundary-accumulating sequence โ€” but subject to the Blaschke condition.


Formal Proof / Solution

Case 1: zn=1โˆ’1/nz_n = 1 - 1/n, can f(zn)=0f(z_n) = 0 for all nn?

Answer: Yes, this is possible.

The accumulation point of {zn}\{z_n\} is z=1z = 1, which lies on the boundary โˆ‚D\partial \mathbb{D}, not inside D\mathbb{D}. The Identity Theorem requires an accumulation point in the domain of analyticity. Since z=1โˆ‰Dz=1 \notin \mathbb{D}, the theorem gives no contradiction.

Explicit example: The Blaschke product. A sequence {an}โŠ‚D\{a_n\} \subset \mathbb{D} is the zero set of a bounded analytic function on D\mathbb{D} if and only if the Blaschke condition holds: โˆ‘n=1โˆž(1โˆ’โˆฃanโˆฃ)<โˆž.\sum_{n=1}^\infty (1 - |a_n|) < \infty.

For an=1โˆ’1/na_n = 1 - 1/n, we compute: โˆ‘n=1โˆž(1โˆ’โˆฃanโˆฃ)=โˆ‘n=1โˆž1n=โˆž.\sum_{n=1}^\infty (1 - |a_n|) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{1}{n} = \infty.

So the Blaschke condition fails for this sequence! This means no bounded analytic function has exactly these zeros. However, an unbounded analytic function can still vanish on this sequence. For instance, consider:

f(z)=expโกโ€‰โฃ(โˆ’11โˆ’z).f(z) = \exp\!\left(-\frac{1}{1-z}\right).

This is analytic on D\mathbb{D} (the argument โˆ’1/(1โˆ’z)-1/(1-z) has real part โ†’โˆ’โˆž\to -\infty as zโ†’1z \to 1 along the real axis), not identically zero, and in fact f(zn)=eโˆ’nโ‰ 0f(z_n) = e^{-n} \neq 0. So this particular ff doesn't work directly, but the key point remains:

A cleaner explicit example with zeros on the sequence {1โˆ’1/n}\{1 - 1/n\}: consider the function

f(z)=sinโกโ€‰โฃ(ฯ€1โˆ’z).f(z) = \sin\!\left(\frac{\pi}{1-z}\right).

This is analytic on D\mathbb{D}, not identically zero, and f(zn)=sinโก(nฯ€)=0f(z_n) = \sin(n\pi) = 0 for all nโ‰ฅ1n \geq 1. โœ“

The zeros zn=1โˆ’1/nz_n = 1 - 1/n accumulate at the boundary point 11, not at any interior point, so the Identity Theorem is not violated.


Why the Identity Theorem is the right tool

Identity Theorem: If ff is analytic on a connected open set UU and the zero set {f=0}\{f = 0\} has an accumulation point inside UU, then fโ‰ก0f \equiv 0 on UU.

The key word is inside. Boundary accumulation is not controlled by analyticity of ff at that point.


Case 2: General sequence wnw_n with โˆฃwnโˆฃโ†’1|w_n| \to 1

Answer: Also possible, subject to the Blaschke condition.

If the sequence satisfies the Blaschke condition โˆ‘(1โˆ’โˆฃwnโˆฃ)<โˆž\sum(1 - |w_n|) < \infty, then the Blaschke product

B(z)=โˆn=1โˆžโˆฃwnโˆฃwnโ‹…wnโˆ’z1โˆ’wnโ€พzB(z) = \prod_{n=1}^\infty \frac{|w_n|}{w_n} \cdot \frac{w_n - z}{1 - \overline{w_n} z}

converges uniformly on compact subsets of D\mathbb{D}, is analytic and bounded (โˆฃBโˆฃโ‰ค1|B| \leq 1), and vanishes exactly on {wn}\{w_n\}.

If the Blaschke condition fails, then no bounded analytic function can have this zero set. However, unbounded analytic functions may still exist with such zeros (as in Case 1 above).


Summary Table

| Situation | Accumulation point | Possible? | Reason | |---|---|---|---| | zn=1โˆ’1/nz_n = 1 - 1/n | z=1โˆˆโˆ‚Dz=1 \in \partial\mathbb{D} | Yes | Identity Thm doesn't apply | | wnโ†’โˆ‚Dw_n \to \partial\mathbb{D}, Blaschke holds | boundary | Yes | Blaschke product works | | Zeros accumulate at interior point | z0โˆˆDz_0 \in \mathbb{D} | No | Identity Theorem |

The elegant takeaway: analyticity has perfect memory inside the domain, but no control on the boundary.

Source: Complex Analysis (Steinโ€“Shakarchi), Chapter 2โ€“5; folklore

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Complex Analysis (Steinโ€“Shakarchi), Chapter 2โ€“5; folkloreEdit on GitHub โ†—