🧮 Brain Teaser

The Casorati–Weierstrass Theorem: Dense Image Near an Essential Singularity

Let ff be holomorphic on the punctured disk 0<z<10 < |z| < 1, with an essential singularity at z=0z = 0.

Prove that for every wCw \in \mathbb{C} and every ε,r>0\varepsilon, r > 0, the image f({0<z<r})f(\{0 < |z| < r\}) intersects the disk wc<ε|w - c| < \varepsilon for all cCc \in \mathbb{C}.

In other words: the image of any punctured neighborhood of an essential singularity is dense in C\mathbb{C}.

As a warm-up sanity check: verify this is consistent with the behaviors f(z)=e1/zf(z) = e^{1/z} near z=0z=0.

essential singularityCasorati-WeierstrassRiemann removable singularityproof by contradictiondense image

Answer: Casorati–Weierstrass: Dense Image Near Essential Singularity

Key Idea / Intuition

If the image of ff avoided a whole disk around some value cc, then 1/(f(z)c)1/(f(z)-c) would be bounded near 00 — forcing 00 to be either a removable singularity or a pole of ff, contradicting the assumption that it's essential. So the image can never dodge an open set: it must be dense.


Formal Proof / Solution

Theorem (Casorati–Weierstrass): If ff has an essential singularity at z0=0z_0 = 0, then for every punctured neighborhood U={0<z<r}U = \{0 < |z| < r\}, the image f(U)f(U) is dense in C\mathbb{C}.


Proof by contradiction:

Suppose f(U)f(U) is not dense in C\mathbb{C}. Then there exists cCc \in \mathbb{C} and ε>0\varepsilon > 0 such that

f(z)cεfor all zU.|f(z) - c| \geq \varepsilon \quad \text{for all } z \in U.

Define

g(z)=1f(z)c,zU.g(z) = \frac{1}{f(z) - c}, \quad z \in U.

Since f(z)cε>0|f(z) - c| \geq \varepsilon > 0, we have gg holomorphic on UU and

g(z)1εfor all zU.|g(z)| \leq \frac{1}{\varepsilon} \quad \text{for all } z \in U.

So gg is bounded on the punctured disk. By Riemann's removable singularity theorem, gg extends to a holomorphic function g~\tilde{g} on the full disk z<r|z| < r.

Case 1: g~(0)0\tilde{g}(0) \neq 0.

Then f(z)=c+1/g~(z)f(z) = c + 1/\tilde{g}(z) extends holomorphically to z=0z = 0. So z=0z = 0 is a removable singularity of ff — contradiction.

Case 2: g~(0)=0\tilde{g}(0) = 0.

Then g~(z)=zmh(z)\tilde{g}(z) = z^m h(z) near 00, where h(0)0h(0) \neq 0 and m1m \geq 1. Thus

f(z)=c+1zmh(z),f(z) = c + \frac{1}{z^m h(z)},

which has a pole of order mm at z=0z = 0 — also a contradiction.

In both cases, we contradict the assumption that z=0z = 0 is an essential singularity. \blacksquare


Sanity check with f(z)=e1/zf(z) = e^{1/z}:

Write z=reiθz = r e^{i\theta}. Then 1/z=1reiθ1/z = \frac{1}{r}e^{-i\theta}, so

e1/z=ecosθ/reisinθ/r.e^{1/z} = e^{\cos\theta/r} \cdot e^{i\sin\theta/r}.

  • The modulus ecosθ/re^{\cos\theta/r} ranges over (0,)(0, \infty) as θ,r\theta, r vary.
  • The argument sinθ/r\sin\theta/r ranges over all of R\mathbb{R} (mod 2π2\pi).

So e1/ze^{1/z} takes all nonzero values and its image is indeed dense in C\mathbb{C} (actually all of C{0}\mathbb{C} \setminus \{0\}, by Picard's great theorem — a much stronger result).


Remark: Picard's Great Theorem strengthens this dramatically: near an essential singularity, ff takes every complex value with at most one exception, infinitely often. Casorati–Weierstrass is the elegant, accessible version of this idea.

Source: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 3; classical theorem

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 3; classical theoremEdit on GitHub ↗