The Absent-Minded Secretary
A secretary types letters and envelopes, then stuffs the letters into envelopes completely at random (one letter per envelope). What is the probability that no letter ends up in the correct envelope?
Now here is the surprising part: what does this probability approach as ?
Answer: The Absent-Minded Secretary
Key Idea / Intuition
This is the classic derangement problem. The clever approach uses inclusion-exclusion: instead of counting directly, we subtract out all the "bad" permutations where at least one letter is correctly placed. The magical punchline is that the answer converges โ rapidly and exactly โ to , no matter how large gets. The series truncates at a familiar friend.
Formal Proof / Solution
Setup. Let be the event that letter goes into the correct envelope. We want:
Inclusion-Exclusion. By inclusion-exclusion:
The term counts the probability that specific letters are all correct (the remaining are free): there are completions out of total.
This simplifies beautifully:
So:
The Answer:
As : Recall , so:
How fast? The error is less than , which is already tiny for or . In fact, the integer number of derangements equals the nearest integer to for all .
Sanity check for small :
| | Derangements | Probability | |-----|-------------|-------------| | 1 | 0 | 0 | | 2 | 1 | 1/2 | | 3 | 2 | 1/3 | | 4 | 9 | 3/8 |
All converging quickly to .
The beautiful surprise: no matter how many letters there are, you always have roughly a chance that nobody gets their own letter back โ a fact that astonishes people every time.
Source: Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability with Solutions (Frederick Mosteller)