🧮 Brain Teaser

The Möbius Transformation That Fixes Three Points

A Möbius transformation is a map of the form f(z)=az+bcz+d,ad−bc≠0,f(z) = \frac{az+b}{cz+d}, \quad ad - bc \neq 0, where a,b,c,d∈Ca,b,c,d \in \mathbb{C}.

Prove that if a Möbius transformation fixes three distinct points in C∪{∞}\mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}, then it must be the identity map.

As a bonus: explain why this means a Möbius transformation is uniquely determined by where it sends any three distinct points.

Möbius transformationfixed pointsrigiditycross-ratiocomplex analysis

Answer: Möbius Transformation Fixed by Three Points

Key Idea / Intuition

A Möbius transformation is determined by exactly 3 degrees of freedom (since we can normalize ad−bc=1ad - bc = 1, leaving 3 free complex parameters). The beautiful rigidity here is: fixing three points "uses up" all those degrees of freedom, forcing the map to be the identity. The cleanest proof works by composing two transformations: if ff fixes three points, then g=f∘(identity)−1g = f \circ (\text{identity})^{-1} fixes three points, and we show any such gg solving g(z)=zg(z) = z as a Möbius transformation equation must be identically zz.


Formal Proof / Solution

Step 1: Reduce to an algebraic equation.

Suppose f(z)=az+bcz+df(z) = \dfrac{az+b}{cz+d} fixes three distinct points z1,z2,z3∈C∪{∞}z_1, z_2, z_3 \in \mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\}.

First handle the case c=0c = 0: then f(z)=adz+bdf(z) = \frac{a}{d}z + \frac{b}{d}, an affine map. If it fixes two finite points z1≠z2z_1 \neq z_2, then adz1+bd=z1andadz2+bd=z2.\frac{a}{d}z_1 + \frac{b}{d} = z_1 \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{a}{d}z_2 + \frac{b}{d} = z_2. Subtracting: ad(z1−z2)=z1−z2\frac{a}{d}(z_1 - z_2) = z_1 - z_2, so ad=1\frac{a}{d} = 1, and then bd=0\frac{b}{d} = 0. Thus f(z)=zf(z) = z. ✓

Step 2: Handle the case c≠0c \neq 0 with three finite fixed points.

The fixed point equation is: f(z)=z  ⟹  az+bcz+d=z  ⟹  az+b=z(cz+d)  ⟹  cz2+(d−a)z−b=0.f(z) = z \implies \frac{az+b}{cz+d} = z \implies az + b = z(cz+d) \implies cz^2 + (d-a)z - b = 0.

This is a quadratic in zz (since c≠0c \neq 0), so it has at most 2 solutions in C\mathbb{C}.

But we assumed ff fixes three distinct points. A quadratic equation cannot have three distinct roots. Contradiction.

Step 3: Handle ∞\infty as a fixed point.

If f(∞)=∞f(\infty) = \infty, then as z→∞z \to \infty, f(z)→acf(z) \to \frac{a}{c}. For this to equal ∞\infty, we need c=0c = 0, which reduces to Step 1.

So if c≠0c \neq 0, then f(∞)≠∞f(\infty) \neq \infty. Combined with Step 2, three fixed points with c≠0c \neq 0 is impossible.

Conclusion: In all cases, three fixed points force f(z)=zf(z) = z. ■\blacksquare


Bonus: Unique determination by three points.

Given three distinct points z1,z2,z3z_1, z_2, z_3 and three distinct target points w1,w2,w3w_1, w_2, w_3, suppose two Möbius transformations ff and gg both send zi↦wiz_i \mapsto w_i. Then the composition h=g−1∘fh = g^{-1} \circ f satisfies h(zi)=zih(z_i) = z_i for i=1,2,3i = 1, 2, 3. By the theorem above, h=idh = \text{id}, so f=gf = g.

This also explains the explicit formula: the unique Möbius transformation sending z1↦0z_1 \mapsto 0, z2↦1z_2 \mapsto 1, z3↦∞z_3 \mapsto \infty is the cross-ratio: f(z)=(z−z1)(z2−z3)(z−z3)(z2−z1).f(z) = \frac{(z - z_1)(z_2 - z_3)}{(z - z_3)(z_2 - z_1)}. Any other three-point mapping is obtained by composing cross-ratios.

Source: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 8; classical folklore

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Stein & Shakarchi, Complex Analysis, Chapter 8; classical folkloreEdit on GitHub ↗