🧮 Brain Teaser

The Maximum Modulus Principle: Where Can a Holomorphic Function Achieve Its Maximum?

Let ff be a holomorphic function on the open unit disk D={zC:z<1}\mathbb{D} = \{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z| < 1\}, continuous on D\overline{\mathbb{D}}.

Suppose f(z)1|f(z)| \leq 1 for all zDz \in \partial \mathbb{D} (the boundary), and that f(z0)=1|f(z_0)| = 1 for some interior point z0Dz_0 \in \mathbb{D}.

What can you conclude about ff?

Now push further: suppose instead f:DDf : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} is holomorphic, f(0)=0f(0) = 0, and f(z0)=z0|f(z_0)| = |z_0| for some z00z_0 \neq 0.

Again, what can you conclude?

maximum modulus principleSchwarz lemmaholomorphic mapsmean value propertyopen mapping theorem

Answer: Maximum Modulus & Schwarz Equality Case

Key Idea / Intuition

A holomorphic function cannot have an interior maximum of its modulus unless it is constant — this is the Maximum Modulus Principle. The reason is deep: holomorphic functions satisfy the mean value property, so the value at the center of any disk is the average of values on the boundary circle. If the modulus achieves a maximum at an interior point, the averaging forces all nearby values to have the same modulus, which then forces ff to be constant via the open mapping theorem.

The second part is precisely the Schwarz Lemma (previously given), but here we derive the equality case from the maximum modulus principle directly.


Formal Proof / Solution

Part 1: ff Must Be Constant

Theorem (Maximum Modulus Principle): If ff is holomorphic and non-constant on a connected open set UU, then f|f| has no local maximum in UU.

Proof sketch via the mean value property:

For any disk D(z0,r)U\overline{D}(z_0, r) \subset U, the mean value property gives: f(z0)=12π02πf(z0+reiθ)dθ.f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})\, d\theta.

Taking moduli: f(z0)12π02πf(z0+reiθ)dθ.|f(z_0)| \leq \frac{1}{2\pi} \int_0^{2\pi} |f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})|\, d\theta.

If f(z0)|f(z_0)| is a maximum, then f(z0)f(z)|f(z_0)| \geq |f(z)| for all zz near z0z_0, so equality holds in the above. Equality in this integral inequality for a continuous function means f(z0+reiθ)=f(z0)|f(z_0 + re^{i\theta})| = |f(z_0)| for all θ\theta — the modulus is constantly equal to f(z0)|f(z_0)| on the circle.

Since r>0r > 0 was arbitrary, f|f| is locally constant near z0z_0. By the open mapping theorem, ff must be constant (a non-constant holomorphic map is open, hence cannot have constant modulus on any open set).

Conclusion for Part 1: fcf \equiv c for some constant cc with c=1|c| = 1.


Part 2: The Schwarz Equality Case

Now f:DDf : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D} is holomorphic, f(0)=0f(0) = 0, and f(z0)=z0|f(z_0)| = |z_0| for some z00z_0 \neq 0.

Define g(z)=f(z)zg(z) = \frac{f(z)}{z} for z0z \neq 0 and g(0)=f(0)g(0) = f'(0). Then gg is holomorphic on D\mathbb{D} (the singularity at 00 is removable since f(0)=0f(0) = 0).

On the boundary z=1|z| = 1: since f:DDf : \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D}, we get f(z)1=z|f(z)| \leq 1 = |z|, so g(z)1|g(z)| \leq 1.

By the Maximum Modulus Principle applied to gg: g(z)1for all zD,|g(z)| \leq 1 \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{D}, which gives f(z)z|f(z)| \leq |z| — this is the Schwarz Lemma.

Now, the assumption f(z0)=z0|f(z_0)| = |z_0| means g(z0)=1|g(z_0)| = 1.

So gg achieves modulus 11 at an interior point z0Dz_0 \in \mathbb{D}.

By Part 1 (Maximum Modulus Principle), gg must be constant: g(z)=eiθfor some θR.g(z) = e^{i\theta} \quad \text{for some } \theta \in \mathbb{R}.

Therefore: f(z)=eiθz,\boxed{f(z) = e^{i\theta} z,} i.e., ff is a rotation. \blacksquare


Why This Is Beautiful

The maximum modulus principle says holomorphic functions are "anti-extremal" in the interior — all extremes happen on the boundary. The equality case of Schwarz reveals that the only holomorphic self-maps of the disk fixing 00 and touching the "size bound" f(z)=z|f(z)| = |z| anywhere are rigid rotations. The mean value averaging property of holomorphic functions is doing all the heavy lifting.

Source: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 2; also mathematical folklore

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 2; also mathematical folkloreEdit on GitHub ↗