The Maximum Modulus Principle: Where Can a Holomorphic Function Achieve Its Maximum?
Let be a holomorphic function on the open unit disk , continuous on .
Suppose for all (the boundary), and that for some interior point .
What can you conclude about ?
Now push further: suppose instead is holomorphic, , and for some .
Again, what can you conclude?
Answer: Maximum Modulus & Schwarz Equality Case
Key Idea / Intuition
A holomorphic function cannot have an interior maximum of its modulus unless it is constant — this is the Maximum Modulus Principle. The reason is deep: holomorphic functions satisfy the mean value property, so the value at the center of any disk is the average of values on the boundary circle. If the modulus achieves a maximum at an interior point, the averaging forces all nearby values to have the same modulus, which then forces to be constant via the open mapping theorem.
The second part is precisely the Schwarz Lemma (previously given), but here we derive the equality case from the maximum modulus principle directly.
Formal Proof / Solution
Part 1: Must Be Constant
Theorem (Maximum Modulus Principle): If is holomorphic and non-constant on a connected open set , then has no local maximum in .
Proof sketch via the mean value property:
For any disk , the mean value property gives:
Taking moduli:
If is a maximum, then for all near , so equality holds in the above. Equality in this integral inequality for a continuous function means for all — the modulus is constantly equal to on the circle.
Since was arbitrary, is locally constant near . By the open mapping theorem, must be constant (a non-constant holomorphic map is open, hence cannot have constant modulus on any open set).
Conclusion for Part 1: for some constant with .
Part 2: The Schwarz Equality Case
Now is holomorphic, , and for some .
Define for and . Then is holomorphic on (the singularity at is removable since ).
On the boundary : since , we get , so .
By the Maximum Modulus Principle applied to : which gives — this is the Schwarz Lemma.
Now, the assumption means .
So achieves modulus at an interior point .
By Part 1 (Maximum Modulus Principle), must be constant:
Therefore: i.e., is a rotation.
Why This Is Beautiful
The maximum modulus principle says holomorphic functions are "anti-extremal" in the interior — all extremes happen on the boundary. The equality case of Schwarz reveals that the only holomorphic self-maps of the disk fixing and touching the "size bound" anywhere are rigid rotations. The mean value averaging property of holomorphic functions is doing all the heavy lifting.
Source: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 2; also mathematical folklore