🧮 Brain Teaser

The Open Mapping Theorem: A Surprising Consequence

Let f:CCf: \mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C} be a non-constant entire function. Prove that the image f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) is dense in C\mathbb{C}.

Now here is the surprise: can you prove the stronger statement that f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) actually omits at most one point of C\mathbb{C}, using only the Open Mapping Theorem (no Picard)?

For the main problem: suppose ff is a non-constant entire function whose image f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) omits an open disk D(w0,r)D(w_0, r). Derive a contradiction using only the Open Mapping Theorem.

Bonus thought: What does this tell you about eze^z?

Open Mapping TheoremLiouville's Theorementire functionsdense imagePicard

Answer: Open Mapping + Liouville: Dense Image of Entire Functions

Key Idea / Intuition

The Open Mapping Theorem says that a non-constant holomorphic map sends open sets to open sets. But C\mathbb{C} is itself open — so the image f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) must be open. If the image also omits an open disk, you can build a bounded entire function, and Liouville kills it.

The beautiful engine here: open image + missing open set → bounded entire function → Liouville → constant. Three big theorems chained in two lines.


Formal Proof / Solution

Step 1: The image f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) is open.

Since ff is non-constant and entire (hence holomorphic), the Open Mapping Theorem guarantees that ff maps open sets to open sets. Since C\mathbb{C} is open, f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) is an open subset of C\mathbb{C}.

Step 2: If f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) omits an open disk, construct a bounded entire function.

Suppose f(C)D(w0,r)=f(\mathbb{C}) \cap D(w_0, r) = \emptyset for some w0Cw_0 \in \mathbb{C} and r>0r > 0. This means: f(z)w0rfor all zC.|f(z) - w_0| \geq r \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{C}.

Define: g(z)=1f(z)w0.g(z) = \frac{1}{f(z) - w_0}.

Since f(z)w0f(z) - w_0 is never zero (it has modulus r>0\geq r > 0 everywhere), gg is entire. Moreover: g(z)=1f(z)w01rfor all zC.|g(z)| = \frac{1}{|f(z) - w_0|} \leq \frac{1}{r} \quad \text{for all } z \in \mathbb{C}.

So gg is a bounded entire function.

Step 3: Apply Liouville's Theorem.

By Liouville's Theorem, gg must be constant. But then f(z)=w0+1g(z)f(z) = w_0 + \frac{1}{g(z)} is also constant — contradicting our assumption that ff is non-constant. \contradiction\contradiction

Conclusion: The image of a non-constant entire function f(C)f(\mathbb{C}) is dense in C\mathbb{C} — it cannot avoid any open set.


Bonus: What about eze^z?

The function eze^z is non-constant and entire, so its image is dense. In fact eze^z omits exactly the point 00 (since ez0e^z \neq 0 for all zz). This is consistent: omitting a single point is not enough to contradict Liouville (you can't build a bounded function from 1ez0=ez\frac{1}{e^z - 0} = e^{-z}, which is itself entire but unbounded). Little Picard sharpens this: a non-constant entire function omits at most one value — and eze^z shows the bound is tight.


The chain of ideas:

Open Mapping    f(C) open    missing open disk    1fw0 bounded entireLiouvilleconstant.\text{Open Mapping} \implies f(\mathbb{C}) \text{ open} \implies \text{missing open disk} \implies \frac{1}{f-w_0} \text{ bounded entire} \xrightarrow{\text{Liouville}} \text{constant.}

Source: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 8 / classical folklore

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 8 / classical folkloreEdit on GitHub ↗