๐Ÿงฎ Brain Teaser

The Residue at Infinity

Let f(z)=z3z2+1f(z) = \dfrac{z^3}{z^2 + 1}.

(a) Compute all finite residues of ff (at poles in C\mathbb{C}).

(b) Show that the sum of all residues of a rational function โ€” including the residue at infinity โ€” equals zero.

(c) Use this to compute the residue of ff at โˆž\infty without any Laurent expansion around โˆž\infty.

Recall: The residue at infinity is defined as Resโกz=โˆžf(z)=โˆ’Resโกz=0[1z2fโ€‰โฃ(1z)].\operatorname{Res}_{z=\infty} f(z) = -\operatorname{Res}_{z=0}\left[\frac{1}{z^2} f\!\left(\frac{1}{z}\right)\right].

residuesRiemann sphererational functionsresidue at infinitycompactness

Answer: Residue at Infinity and the Sum Rule

Key Idea / Intuition

The Riemann sphere C^=Cโˆช{โˆž}\hat{\mathbb{C}} = \mathbb{C} \cup \{\infty\} is a compact surface. By the residue theorem applied to a large contour enclosing all finite poles, the sum of finite residues equals the integral around a big circle โ€” but traversed in the opposite orientation relative to โˆž\infty. This sign flip is exactly what makes the total sum (finite + infinite) vanish. So for a rational function, computing the residue at โˆž\infty is trivially free once you know all the finite residues.


Formal Proof / Solution

Part (a): Finite Residues

The poles of f(z)=z3z2+1f(z) = \dfrac{z^3}{z^2+1} are at z=ยฑiz = \pm i (simple poles).

Resโกz=if=limโกzโ†’i(zโˆ’i)z3(zโˆ’i)(z+i)=i32i=โˆ’i2i=โˆ’12.\operatorname{Res}_{z=i} f = \lim_{z \to i}(z-i)\frac{z^3}{(z-i)(z+i)} = \frac{i^3}{2i} = \frac{-i}{2i} = -\frac{1}{2}.

Resโกz=โˆ’if=limโกzโ†’โˆ’i(z+i)z3(zโˆ’i)(z+i)=(โˆ’i)3โˆ’2i=iโˆ’2i=โˆ’12.\operatorname{Res}_{z=-i} f = \lim_{z \to -i}(z+i)\frac{z^3}{(z-i)(z+i)} = \frac{(-i)^3}{-2i} = \frac{i}{-2i} = -\frac{1}{2}.

So both finite residues equal โˆ’12-\tfrac{1}{2}, and their sum is โˆ’1-1.


Part (b): Sum of All Residues Equals Zero

Let ff be a rational function. Choose RR large enough so that the disk โˆฃzโˆฃโ‰คR|z| \leq R contains all finite poles z1,โ€ฆ,znz_1, \ldots, z_n.

By the residue theorem (counterclockwise orientation): โˆฎโˆฃzโˆฃ=Rf(z)โ€‰dz=2ฯ€iโˆ‘k=1nResโกz=zkf(z).\oint_{|z|=R} f(z)\,dz = 2\pi i \sum_{k=1}^n \operatorname{Res}_{z=z_k} f(z).

Now the residue at infinity is defined precisely so that: Resโกz=โˆžf(z)=โˆ’12ฯ€iโˆฎโˆฃzโˆฃ=Rf(z)โ€‰dz\operatorname{Res}_{z=\infty} f(z) = -\frac{1}{2\pi i}\oint_{|z|=R} f(z)\,dz

(the minus sign comes from the fact that, from โˆž\infty's perspective, the circle โˆฃzโˆฃ=R|z|=R is traversed clockwise).

Therefore: โˆ‘k=1nResโกz=zkf+Resโกz=โˆžf=0.\sum_{k=1}^n \operatorname{Res}_{z=z_k} f + \operatorname{Res}_{z=\infty} f = 0.

Alternatively via behavior at โˆž\infty: For a rational function f(z)=O(zโˆ’2)f(z) = O(z^{-2}) as zโ†’โˆžz \to \infty (e.g., degree of numerator โ‰ค\leq degree of denominator โˆ’2-2), the integral over โˆฃzโˆฃ=R|z|=R vanishes as Rโ†’โˆžR \to \infty by the ML estimate, giving the same conclusion. For f(z)=O(zm)f(z) = O(z^m) with mโ‰ฅโˆ’1m \geq -1, the residue at โˆž\infty is defined via the local coordinate w=1/zw = 1/z and captures the remaining contribution.


Part (c): Residue at โˆž\infty by the Sum Rule

From part (b): Resโกz=โˆžf=โˆ’(Resโกz=if+Resโกz=โˆ’if)=โˆ’(โˆ’12โˆ’12)=1.\operatorname{Res}_{z=\infty} f = -\left(\operatorname{Res}_{z=i} f + \operatorname{Res}_{z=-i} f\right) = -\left(-\frac{1}{2} - \frac{1}{2}\right) = \boxed{1}.

Verification via definition: Substituting z=1/wz = 1/w: 1w2fโ€‰โฃ(1w)=1w2โ‹…1/w31/w2+1=1w3โ‹…11+w2=1w3(1โˆ’w2+โ‹ฏโ€‰).\frac{1}{w^2}f\!\left(\frac{1}{w}\right) = \frac{1}{w^2}\cdot\frac{1/w^3}{1/w^2+1} = \frac{1}{w^3}\cdot\frac{1}{1+w^2} = \frac{1}{w^3}(1 - w^2 + \cdots).

The coefficient of 1/w1/w (i.e., the wโˆ’1w^{-1} term) in this Laurent expansion is โˆ’1-1, so: Resโกz=โˆžf=โˆ’(โˆ’1)=1.โœ“\operatorname{Res}_{z=\infty} f = -(-1) = 1. \checkmark


The beautiful takeaway: The Riemann sphere forces a global conservation law on residues. A rational function cannot have residues that "escape" โ€” they must balance to zero over the compact surface C^\hat{\mathbb{C}}. This is the complex-analytic shadow of the fact that a compact manifold has no boundary.

Written to: questions/2025-07-13_PM_residue_at_infinity.md

Answer written to: questions/2025-07-13_PM_residue_at_infinity_answer.md

Source: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 3; classical folklore

Type: Complex AnalysisSource: Complex Analysis, Stein & Shakarchi, Chapter 3; classical folkloreEdit on GitHub โ†—